Assessment of trunk movement and posture in spastic and dyskinetic cerebral palsy: A scoping review

AIM: To map and summarize available clinical and instrumented assessment tools for evaluating trunk control in individuals with spastic or dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP) across Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels, describing their current application, assessed features, and psychometric properties, to provide first practical guidance for tool use. METHOD: For this scoping review, eight databases were systematically searched. Studies were included if they evaluated reliability, validity, or responsiveness of tools assessing trunk control in spastic/dyskinetic CP. The review followed the methodology of the JBI and the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). RESULTS: The search yielded 27 332 publications, of which 110 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two distinct assessment tools were identified, including 12 clinical and 10 instrumented. Instrumented assessment tools were most frequently investigated (65%). Validity was reported in 62% of studies; reliability and responsiveness in 30% and 0% respectively. Notably, 85% of studies focused exclusively on individuals with spastic CP, only 28% addressed individuals with CP classified in GMFCS levels IV or V. INTERPRETATION: This review highlights critical gaps in research on trunk control assessment in CP, particularly for patients with severe disabilities, tool responsiveness, and coverage of key facets of trunk control. Future research should prioritize thorough psychometric evaluation of tools, across facets, accounting for the diverse applications and heterogenous clinical presentations in CP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.70210
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of trunk movement and posture in spastic and dyskinetic cerebral palsy: A scoping review

Kate Himmelmann, Meta Nyström Eek, Helga Haberfehlner, Ellen Van Wonterghem et al.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

Assessment of trunk movement and posture in spastic and dyskinetic cerebral palsy: A scoping review

Kate Himmelmann, Meta Nyström Eek, Helga Haberfehlner, Ellen Van Wonterghem, K. Desloovere, Elegast Monbaliu, Inti Vanmechelen, Anna‐Klara Nohlin Sandsjö
article en

Abstract

AIM: To map and summarize available clinical and instrumented assessment tools for evaluating trunk control in individuals with spastic or dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP) across Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels, describing their current application, assessed features, and psychometric properties, to provide first practical guidance for tool use. METHOD: For this scoping review, eight databases were systematically searched. Studies were included if they evaluated reliability, validity, or responsiveness of tools assessing trunk control in spastic/dyskinetic CP. The review followed the methodology of the JBI and the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). RESULTS: The search yielded 27 332 publications, of which 110 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two distinct assessment tools were identified, including 12 clinical and 10 instrumented. Instrumented assessment tools were most frequently investigated (65%). Validity was reported in 62% of studies; reliability and responsiveness in 30% and 0% respectively. Notably, 85% of studies focused exclusively on individuals with spastic CP, only 28% addressed individuals with CP classified in GMFCS levels IV or V. INTERPRETATION: This review highlights critical gaps in research on trunk control assessment in CP, particularly for patients with severe disabilities, tool responsiveness, and coverage of key facets of trunk control. Future research should prioritize thorough psychometric evaluation of tools, across facets, accounting for the diverse applications and heterogenous clinical presentations in CP.

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Catholic University College of Bruges–Ostend (BE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Psychotherapy & Movement (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Gothenburg (SE), KU Leuven (BE)
Stiftelsen Promobilia, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.