Synthetic cervical spine radiographs: expert validation and transfer learning for low-data settings

Application of machine learning (ML) in neuroimaging is often constrained by the difficulty of assembling, sharing, and utilizing large, high-quality datasets. Synthetic data may address limitations in traditional data-sharing by enabling privacy-preserving image generation at scale. We evaluated whether: (1) a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) could generate realistic synthetic lateral cervical spine radiographs, and (2) whether synthetic data could support transfer learning for anatomical landmark localization in low-data settings. We trained a DDPM on 4,963 radiographs from the Cervical Spine X-ray Atlas (CSXA) to generate synthetic images. Blinded expert validation involved six neuroradiologists and two spine fellowship-trained neurosurgeons reviewing 50 randomly selected image quartets, each containing one real and three synthetic images. Experts attempted to identify the real scan and rated the realism of each image on a four-point Likert scale. To assess privacy preservation and potential memorization, we performed a real-synthetic nearest-neighbor search using vision transformer image embeddings ranked by cosine similarity. We then generated pseudolandmarks for our curated synthetic dataset and trained a landmark-localization backbone. External evaluation was performed on the Cervical Lateral X-ray 34-point (CLX-34) dataset using a directly matched 22-landmark task, comparing fine-tuning from the synthetic backbone and de novo training on increasing amounts of CLX-34 data. Experts correctly identified the real image in 29.0% of trials, with low inter-rater agreement (Fleiss’ κ = 0.061). Mean realism ratings did not differ significantly between real and synthetic images, and no visually explicit memorization was identified among the 100 most similar real-synthetic pairs. After manual quality control, the final released synthetic dataset comprised 20,063 radiographs. On the external CLX-34 test set (n = 374), fine-tuning from the synthetic backbone outperformed de novo training at 6 of 7 matched training sizes. The advantage was greatest in low-data settings, and the fine-tuned model achieved the best overall performance at n = 700 (mean MSE 4.37 vs. 7.42). We present synthetic cervical spine radiographs that are statistically indistinguishable from real scans in blinded expert review and that provide useful initialization for landmark localization when external labeled data are limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03479-0
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthetic cervical spine radiographs: expert validation and transfer learning for low-data settings

Morgan Willson, John T. Lysack, Eddie Guo, Garnette R. Sutherland et al.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

Synthetic cervical spine radiographs: expert validation and transfer learning for low-data settings

Morgan Willson, John T. Lysack, Eddie Guo, Garnette R. Sutherland, David W. Cadotte, Anthony Winder, Muneer Eesa, Michael Yang, Sanju Lama, Austin Barr, William F. Morrish, James N. Scott, Ian Y. M. Chan, Brij S. Karmur
article en

Abstract

Application of machine learning (ML) in neuroimaging is often constrained by the difficulty of assembling, sharing, and utilizing large, high-quality datasets. Synthetic data may address limitations in traditional data-sharing by enabling privacy-preserving image generation at scale. We evaluated whether: (1) a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) could generate realistic synthetic lateral cervical spine radiographs, and (2) whether synthetic data could support transfer learning for anatomical landmark localization in low-data settings. We trained a DDPM on 4,963 radiographs from the Cervical Spine X-ray Atlas (CSXA) to generate synthetic images. Blinded expert validation involved six neuroradiologists and two spine fellowship-trained neurosurgeons reviewing 50 randomly selected image quartets, each containing one real and three synthetic images. Experts attempted to identify the real scan and rated the realism of each image on a four-point Likert scale. To assess privacy preservation and potential memorization, we performed a real-synthetic nearest-neighbor search using vision transformer image embeddings ranked by cosine similarity. We then generated pseudolandmarks for our curated synthetic dataset and trained a landmark-localization backbone. External evaluation was performed on the Cervical Lateral X-ray 34-point (CLX-34) dataset using a directly matched 22-landmark task, comparing fine-tuning from the synthetic backbone and de novo training on increasing amounts of CLX-34 data. Experts correctly identified the real image in 29.0% of trials, with low inter-rater agreement (Fleiss’ κ = 0.061). Mean realism ratings did not differ significantly between real and synthetic images, and no visually explicit memorization was identified among the 100 most similar real-synthetic pairs. After manual quality control, the final released synthetic dataset comprised 20,063 radiographs. On the external CLX-34 test set (n = 374), fine-tuning from the synthetic backbone outperformed de novo training at 6 of 7 matched training sizes. The advantage was greatest in low-data settings, and the fine-tuned model achieved the best overall performance at n = 700 (mean MSE 4.37 vs. 7.42). We present synthetic cervical spine radiographs that are statistically indistinguishable from real scans in blinded expert review and that provide useful initialization for landmark localization when external labeled data are limited.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.