The Effects of Lumbar Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness on Clinical, Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low back pain is multifactorial, making it difficult to isolate pain-related motor adaptations. Experimental pain models may help clarify these mechanisms. This systematic review evaluates lumbar delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) as a movement-evoked pain model and its effects on clinical, biomechanical and neuromuscular outcomes. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: The meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251051399) included studies of healthy adults with experimentally induced DOMS, with outcomes assessed within 5 days under the influence of DOMS. Databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAH) were searched (9/12/2025), with manual screening. Independent study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment (NIH Quality Assessment Tool) were performed. Random-effects meta-analysis calculated standardized mean differences (SMDs). Sensitivity analyses and GRADE (Cochrane) assessed robustness and evidence certainty. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included (452 participants). DOMS significantly increased low back pain intensity (SMD: Day 1 with DOMS = 1.12, Day 2 = 0.94, Day 3 = 0.69, Day 4 = 0.49) and soreness (Day 1 = 1.94, Day 2 = 1.66, Day 3 = 0.88, Day 4 = 0.59). Pressure pain thresholds decreased significantly (Day 1 = -0.47, Day 2 = -0.44). Trunk extension maximal voluntary contraction decreased significantly (Day 1 = -0.67, Day 2 = -0.95, Day 3 = -0.84, Day 4 = -0.38), while trunk flexion range of motion and flexion relaxation ratios remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar DOMS replicates low back pain features, movement-evoked pain, increased sensitivity and reduced muscle function, providing a non-invasive model to study short-term neuromuscular adaptations in a controlled setting. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review highlights lumbar DOMS as a safe, non-invasive model to study short-term neuromuscular adaptations to pain to better understand pain mechanism. This synthesis provides foundational work for future studies using DOMS to explore LBP mechanisms. By clarifying its strengths (e.g., ecological validity for acute pain) and limitations (e.g., short duration, lack of pain-related psychological factors), we aimed to guide more standardized applications of this model in pain research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pain
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70264
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Lumbar Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness on Clinical, Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Jacques Abboud, Julien Ducas, Martin Descarreaux, Émilie Gauthier‐Wong et al.
European Journal of Pain
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

The Effects of Lumbar Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness on Clinical, Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Jacques Abboud, Julien Ducas, Martin Descarreaux, Émilie Gauthier‐Wong, Clémentine Véret
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low back pain is multifactorial, making it difficult to isolate pain-related motor adaptations. Experimental pain models may help clarify these mechanisms. This systematic review evaluates lumbar delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) as a movement-evoked pain model and its effects on clinical, biomechanical and neuromuscular outcomes. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: The meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251051399) included studies of healthy adults with experimentally induced DOMS, with outcomes assessed within 5 days under the influence of DOMS. Databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAH) were searched (9/12/2025), with manual screening. Independent study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment (NIH Quality Assessment Tool) were performed. Random-effects meta-analysis calculated standardized mean differences (SMDs). Sensitivity analyses and GRADE (Cochrane) assessed robustness and evidence certainty. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included (452 participants). DOMS significantly increased low back pain intensity (SMD: Day 1 with DOMS = 1.12, Day 2 = 0.94, Day 3 = 0.69, Day 4 = 0.49) and soreness (Day 1 = 1.94, Day 2 = 1.66, Day 3 = 0.88, Day 4 = 0.59). Pressure pain thresholds decreased significantly (Day 1 = -0.47, Day 2 = -0.44). Trunk extension maximal voluntary contraction decreased significantly (Day 1 = -0.67, Day 2 = -0.95, Day 3 = -0.84, Day 4 = -0.38), while trunk flexion range of motion and flexion relaxation ratios remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar DOMS replicates low back pain features, movement-evoked pain, increased sensitivity and reduced muscle function, providing a non-invasive model to study short-term neuromuscular adaptations in a controlled setting. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review highlights lumbar DOMS as a safe, non-invasive model to study short-term neuromuscular adaptations to pain to better understand pain mechanism. This synthesis provides foundational work for future studies using DOMS to explore LBP mechanisms. By clarifying its strengths (e.g., ecological validity for acute pain) and limitations (e.g., short duration, lack of pain-related psychological factors), we aimed to guide more standardized applications of this model in pain research.

European Journal of PainVol. 30(4)
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.