Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: An Evidence-Based Review

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently considered the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis, although controversies persist regarding optimal timing, management of severe disease, and treatment in high-risk populations. This review summarizes current evidence on the effectiveness, safety, and indications of LC compared with open surgery and percutaneous drainage. Available data consistently demonstrate that LC is associated with lower morbidity, mortality, and shorter hospital stay compared with open cholecystectomy. Early LC is generally favored, as it reduces complications and overall hospitalization. However, in severe inflammation or high-risk patients, complication rates and conversion to open surgery increase, and alternative strategies such as percutaneous cholecystostomy may be appropriate. Outcomes are strongly influenced by surgical expertise and patient selection. Overall, LC remains the preferred treatment for most patients with acute cholecystitis, provided that appropriate clinical judgment and bailout strategies are applied in complex cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19509990
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: An Evidence-Based Review

José Luis Castro Trejo, Emily Villagomez Guzmán, Karla Daniela Martínez García, Juan Pablo Rubén Quiroga Cruz et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: An Evidence-Based Review

José Luis Castro Trejo, Emily Villagomez Guzmán, Karla Daniela Martínez García, Juan Pablo Rubén Quiroga Cruz, Mario Lujano González
article en

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently considered the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis, although controversies persist regarding optimal timing, management of severe disease, and treatment in high-risk populations. This review summarizes current evidence on the effectiveness, safety, and indications of LC compared with open surgery and percutaneous drainage. Available data consistently demonstrate that LC is associated with lower morbidity, mortality, and shorter hospital stay compared with open cholecystectomy. Early LC is generally favored, as it reduces complications and overall hospitalization. However, in severe inflammation or high-risk patients, complication rates and conversion to open surgery increase, and alternative strategies such as percutaneous cholecystostomy may be appropriate. Outcomes are strongly influenced by surgical expertise and patient selection. Overall, LC remains the preferred treatment for most patients with acute cholecystitis, provided that appropriate clinical judgment and bailout strategies are applied in complex cases.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara (MX), Tominaga hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.