Cadence and tibial acceleration in runners with and without patellofemoral pain

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the main injuries in runners and the most common site of injury during ultramarathon races. The association between running biomechanics and PFP has been investigated over the years and conflicting to moderate evidence were found for kinematic and kinetic aspects. Differences in cadence and tibial acceleration should be investigated, as they are accessible variables used in gait retraining. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cadence and peak vertical tibial acceleration between runners with PFP and pain-free controls. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 53 recreational rearfoot strike runners (PFP n = 27; Controls n = 26). All participants ran at 10 km/h on a motorized treadmill (Movement XL 1600) for 1 minute with the Tgforce accelerometer (v2.0.0.10) fixed to the anteromedial region of the right tibia above the medial malleolus. Cadence (steps/min) and vertical acceleration of the tibia (g) were measured. A significance level of α = 0.05 was adopted. RESULTS: Values of 164.22 (8.08) steps/min and 6.88 (2.01) g were found for participants with PFP, whereas 171.53 (9.89) steps/min and 6.62 (1.55) g were found for the pain-free controls. A significant difference was found for cadence (p = .007; d = 0.80) but not for vertical tibial acceleration (p > .05; d = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Participants with PFP had lower cadence values when compared to healthy runners. However, differences in tibial vertical acceleration were not found. Future studies should evaluate other aspects that can discriminate between healthy runners and those with PFP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PM&R
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70124
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cadence and tibial acceleration in runners with and without patellofemoral pain

João Paulo Chieregato Matheus, José Roberto de Souza Júnior, Thiago Vilela Lemos, Maikon Gleibyson Rodrigues dos Santos et al.
PM&R
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Cadence and tibial acceleration in runners with and without patellofemoral pain

João Paulo Chieregato Matheus, José Roberto de Souza Júnior, Thiago Vilela Lemos, Maikon Gleibyson Rodrigues dos Santos, Leonardo Luiz Barretti Secchi, Glauber Marques Paraizo Barbosa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the main injuries in runners and the most common site of injury during ultramarathon races. The association between running biomechanics and PFP has been investigated over the years and conflicting to moderate evidence were found for kinematic and kinetic aspects. Differences in cadence and tibial acceleration should be investigated, as they are accessible variables used in gait retraining. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cadence and peak vertical tibial acceleration between runners with PFP and pain-free controls. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 53 recreational rearfoot strike runners (PFP n = 27; Controls n = 26). All participants ran at 10 km/h on a motorized treadmill (Movement XL 1600) for 1 minute with the Tgforce accelerometer (v2.0.0.10) fixed to the anteromedial region of the right tibia above the medial malleolus. Cadence (steps/min) and vertical acceleration of the tibia (g) were measured. A significance level of α = 0.05 was adopted. RESULTS: Values of 164.22 (8.08) steps/min and 6.88 (2.01) g were found for participants with PFP, whereas 171.53 (9.89) steps/min and 6.62 (1.55) g were found for the pain-free controls. A significant difference was found for cadence (p = .007; d = 0.80) but not for vertical tibial acceleration (p > .05; d = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Participants with PFP had lower cadence values when compared to healthy runners. However, differences in tibial vertical acceleration were not found. Future studies should evaluate other aspects that can discriminate between healthy runners and those with PFP.

PM&R
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade Estadual de Goiás (BR), Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (BR), Universidade Paulista (BR), University Center of Brasília (BR), Centro Universitário do Distrito Federal (BR), Associação Paulista de Medicina (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.