EXPRESS: Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with anesthesia awakening nursing on agitation and hemodynamics in patients under general anesthesia during awakening period

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, effectively managing agitation and hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia awakening remains challenging, despite their importance for patient safety and recovery. PURPOSE: This study aimed to expound the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with anesthesia awakening nursing on agitation and hemodynamics in patients under general anesthesia during awakening period. STUDY TYPE: A prospective studyPopulation: Ninety patients who underwent general anesthesia surgery were selected and divided into a control group (dexmedetomidine+routine nursing care) and an intervention group (dexmedetomidine+anesthesia awakening nursing), with 45 cases in each group.Assessment technique(s) or outcome(s):The post-anesthesia recovery room stay and awakening time, VAS score, the occurrence of agitation during the awakening period, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: Categorical data were expressed as rates or percentages; measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Differences were significant at P < 0.05 (two-sided). RESULTS: Intervention group patients had shorter recovery room stay (29.98±6.88 vs. 37.78±6.58 min) and recovery time (8.52±0.99 vs. 10.62±0.99 min) versus controls (P<0.05). VAS scores were lower at 2 hours (4.53±0.63 vs. 5.58±0.54) and 6 hours post-surgery (2.47±0.69 vs. 4.49±0.51). Anesthesia recovery agitation (13.33% vs. 37.78%) and postoperative adverse reactions (11.11% vs. 44.44%) were reduced (all P<0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine combined with anesthesia awakening care can enhance sedation scores, reduce pain levels, and have a minimal impact on patients' hemodynamics, ultimately improving the quality of awakening. This approach also leads to higher patient satisfaction with care, making it a promising option for clinical promotion and application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589261444738
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPRESS: Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with anesthesia awakening nursing on agitation and hemodynamics in patients under general anesthesia during awakening period

Xiaoyuan Chen, Zhenwei Sun
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

EXPRESS: Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with anesthesia awakening nursing on agitation and hemodynamics in patients under general anesthesia during awakening period

Xiaoyuan Chen, Zhenwei Sun
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, effectively managing agitation and hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia awakening remains challenging, despite their importance for patient safety and recovery. PURPOSE: This study aimed to expound the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with anesthesia awakening nursing on agitation and hemodynamics in patients under general anesthesia during awakening period. STUDY TYPE: A prospective studyPopulation: Ninety patients who underwent general anesthesia surgery were selected and divided into a control group (dexmedetomidine+routine nursing care) and an intervention group (dexmedetomidine+anesthesia awakening nursing), with 45 cases in each group.Assessment technique(s) or outcome(s):The post-anesthesia recovery room stay and awakening time, VAS score, the occurrence of agitation during the awakening period, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: Categorical data were expressed as rates or percentages; measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Differences were significant at P < 0.05 (two-sided). RESULTS: Intervention group patients had shorter recovery room stay (29.98±6.88 vs. 37.78±6.58 min) and recovery time (8.52±0.99 vs. 10.62±0.99 min) versus controls (P<0.05). VAS scores were lower at 2 hours (4.53±0.63 vs. 5.58±0.54) and 6 hours post-surgery (2.47±0.69 vs. 4.49±0.51). Anesthesia recovery agitation (13.33% vs. 37.78%) and postoperative adverse reactions (11.11% vs. 44.44%) were reduced (all P<0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine combined with anesthesia awakening care can enhance sedation scores, reduce pain levels, and have a minimal impact on patients' hemodynamics, ultimately improving the quality of awakening. This approach also leads to higher patient satisfaction with care, making it a promising option for clinical promotion and application.

Journal of Investigative Medicine
First Hospital of Jiaxing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.