Evaluation of the diagnostic value of three YiDiXie tests in prostate cancer: an observational prospective single-center study

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are widely used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), but relatively inaccurate results may affect diagnosis and treatment. There is an urgent need to find convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false positive and false negative rates of PSA or MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-30, YiDiXie-32, and YiDiXie-48 in prostate cancer. This study ultimately included 562 participants (malignant group, n = 357; benign group, n = 205). Residual serum samples from the participants were collected and tested using the YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio(PLR) and negative likelihood ratio(NLR) of YiDiXie-30, YiDiXie-32 and YiDiXie-48, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves’ analyses were included in this study. The sensitivity of YiDiXie-30 was 81.2%, with a specificity of 93.2%, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 11.9, and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.20. Corresponding values for YiDiXie-32 were 93.6%, 85.4%, 6.4, and 0.08, while those for YiDiXie-48 were 99.4%, 61.5%, 2.6, and 0.01, respectively. Further studies found that YiDiXie-30, YiDiXie-32, and YiDiXie-48 yielded similar results in patients with positive or negative PSA or MRI. The results of the single-center study showed that the YiDiXie tests were highly effective in diagnosing prostate cancer, with clearly different levels of sensitivity and specificity. The YiDiXie tests show strong diagnostic utility for prostate cancer within the particular clinical and population context of this study cohort, especially the YiDiXie-30 (extremely high PLR) and YiDiXie-48 ((extremely low NLR). This method has the potential to significantly reduce needless biopsies brought on by false-positive PSA or MRI results. The two main issues of “excessively high false-positive rates” and “excessively high false-negative rates” in PSA or MRI are anticipated to be addressed. Clinical Research Registry Number: ChiCTR2200066840.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41577-1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of three YiDiXie tests in prostate cancer: an observational prospective single-center study

Liangchao Ni, W. WANG, Pengfei Zhang, Yongqing Lai et al.
Scientific Reports
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of three YiDiXie tests in prostate cancer: an observational prospective single-center study

Liangchao Ni, W. WANG, Pengfei Zhang, Yongqing Lai, Zhenjian Ge, Xutai Li, Huimei Zhou, Yutong Wu, Shengjie Lin, Chen Sun, Rong Huang, Siwei Chen
article en

Abstract

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are widely used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), but relatively inaccurate results may affect diagnosis and treatment. There is an urgent need to find convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false positive and false negative rates of PSA or MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-30, YiDiXie-32, and YiDiXie-48 in prostate cancer. This study ultimately included 562 participants (malignant group, n = 357; benign group, n = 205). Residual serum samples from the participants were collected and tested using the YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio(PLR) and negative likelihood ratio(NLR) of YiDiXie-30, YiDiXie-32 and YiDiXie-48, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves’ analyses were included in this study. The sensitivity of YiDiXie-30 was 81.2%, with a specificity of 93.2%, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 11.9, and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.20. Corresponding values for YiDiXie-32 were 93.6%, 85.4%, 6.4, and 0.08, while those for YiDiXie-48 were 99.4%, 61.5%, 2.6, and 0.01, respectively. Further studies found that YiDiXie-30, YiDiXie-32, and YiDiXie-48 yielded similar results in patients with positive or negative PSA or MRI. The results of the single-center study showed that the YiDiXie tests were highly effective in diagnosing prostate cancer, with clearly different levels of sensitivity and specificity. The YiDiXie tests show strong diagnostic utility for prostate cancer within the particular clinical and population context of this study cohort, especially the YiDiXie-30 (extremely high PLR) and YiDiXie-48 ((extremely low NLR). This method has the potential to significantly reduce needless biopsies brought on by false-positive PSA or MRI results. The two main issues of “excessively high false-positive rates” and “excessively high false-negative rates” in PSA or MRI are anticipated to be addressed. Clinical Research Registry Number: ChiCTR2200066840.

Scientific Reports
Anhui Medical University (CN), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), Shantou University (CN), Foxconn (China) (CN), ShenZhen People’s Hospital (CN), Shantou University Medical College (CN), Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Shenzhen University Health Science Center (CN), Shenzhen Institute for Drug Control (CN), Shenzhen Pingle Orthopedic Hospital (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Peking University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.