Student Debt and Aggregate Consumption: Does Inequality Matter?

ABSTRACT This paper examines the role of income inequality in amplifying the macroeconomic effects of student debt. I argue that inequality captures structural differences in households' access to non‐student credit, with higher inequality reflecting a greater concentration of credit‐constrained households and thereby amplifying the adverse effects of student debt repayment on consumption. Using state‐level data, I show that the negative association between student debt and subsequent aggregate consumption growth is significantly stronger in states with higher inequality. Consistent with this mechanism, several stylized facts indicate that higher inequality is associated with lower levels of non‐student debt. Finally, I develop a simple model illustrating how income inequality increases the prevalence of borrowing constraints, thereby amplifying the sensitivity of consumption to debt repayment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70068
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student Debt and Aggregate Consumption: Does Inequality Matter?

Berrak Bahadir
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

Student Debt and Aggregate Consumption: Does Inequality Matter?

Berrak Bahadir
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the role of income inequality in amplifying the macroeconomic effects of student debt. I argue that inequality captures structural differences in households' access to non‐student credit, with higher inequality reflecting a greater concentration of credit‐constrained households and thereby amplifying the adverse effects of student debt repayment on consumption. Using state‐level data, I show that the negative association between student debt and subsequent aggregate consumption growth is significantly stronger in states with higher inequality. Consistent with this mechanism, several stylized facts indicate that higher inequality is associated with lower levels of non‐student debt. Finally, I develop a simple model illustrating how income inequality increases the prevalence of borrowing constraints, thereby amplifying the sensitivity of consumption to debt repayment.

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Florida International University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.