Comparisons of longitudinal speech outcomes in children born with cleft palate ± cleft lip with and without additional conditions at 5 and 10 years –a registry study

Speech outcome differences in children with cleft palate ± cleft lip (CP ± L) with ( +) and without (-) additional conditions (i.e., diagnosed syndromes, additional malformations, and intellectual disabilities) are not fully explored. The Swedish cleft lip and palate (CLP) registry enables a longitudinal approach. Thus, the purpose was to compare longitudinal speech outcomes in children with different cleft types, with and without additional conditions, at ages 5 and 10 years, based on registry data. Included were all children with oral clefts involving the palate born in Sweden 2009–2012, with speech registrations at both 5 and 10 years in the Swedish CLP registry (n = 404): 16 cleft soft palate (SP) + , 37 SP-, 67 cleft soft and hard palate (SHP) + , 88 SHP-, 19 unilateral cleft lip palate (UCLP) + , 116 UCLP-, 15 bilateral cleft lip palate (BCLP) + and 46 BCLP-. The speech outcomes percentage of consonants correct, percentage of nonoral speech errors, velopharyngeal competence, and results of the Intelligibility in Context Scale were dichotomized. For group comparisons, Pearson’s chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were performed. No significant differences were found between the UCLP + /UCLP- and BCLP + /BCLP- groups. In the SP group, a significantly lower proportion of participants with additional conditions than without had age-appropriate consonant production at age 5 (SP + 33.3%; SP- 79.4%), sufficient velopharyngeal function at age 10 (SP + 73.3%; SP- 97.3%), and always intelligible speech at age 10 (SP + 33.3%; SP- 78.6%). In the SHP group, a significantly lower proportion of participants with additional conditions than without had age-appropriate consonant production at age 5 (SHP + 60.6%; SHP- 82.1%) and 10 (SHP + 73.8%; SHP-95.5%), sufficient velopharyngeal function at age 5 (SHP + 82.1%; SHP- 95.5%), and always intelligible speech at age 10 years (SHP + 51.7%; SHP- 83.8%). For all cleft types with and without additional conditions and for all measured speech outcomes, speech improved between 5 and 10 years of age. Speech results were poorer for children with SP + and SHP + at both 5 and 10 years of age. The results highlight the need to consider heterogeneity within cleft subgroups when planning speech improving interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-06841-3
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparisons of longitudinal speech outcomes in children born with cleft palate ± cleft lip with and without additional conditions at 5 and 10 years –a registry study

Christina Persson, Ann Malmenholt, Kristina Klintö
BMC Pediatrics
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Comparisons of longitudinal speech outcomes in children born with cleft palate ± cleft lip with and without additional conditions at 5 and 10 years –a registry study

Christina Persson, Ann Malmenholt, Kristina Klintö
article en

Abstract

Speech outcome differences in children with cleft palate ± cleft lip (CP ± L) with ( +) and without (-) additional conditions (i.e., diagnosed syndromes, additional malformations, and intellectual disabilities) are not fully explored. The Swedish cleft lip and palate (CLP) registry enables a longitudinal approach. Thus, the purpose was to compare longitudinal speech outcomes in children with different cleft types, with and without additional conditions, at ages 5 and 10 years, based on registry data. Included were all children with oral clefts involving the palate born in Sweden 2009–2012, with speech registrations at both 5 and 10 years in the Swedish CLP registry (n = 404): 16 cleft soft palate (SP) + , 37 SP-, 67 cleft soft and hard palate (SHP) + , 88 SHP-, 19 unilateral cleft lip palate (UCLP) + , 116 UCLP-, 15 bilateral cleft lip palate (BCLP) + and 46 BCLP-. The speech outcomes percentage of consonants correct, percentage of nonoral speech errors, velopharyngeal competence, and results of the Intelligibility in Context Scale were dichotomized. For group comparisons, Pearson’s chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were performed. No significant differences were found between the UCLP + /UCLP- and BCLP + /BCLP- groups. In the SP group, a significantly lower proportion of participants with additional conditions than without had age-appropriate consonant production at age 5 (SP + 33.3%; SP- 79.4%), sufficient velopharyngeal function at age 10 (SP + 73.3%; SP- 97.3%), and always intelligible speech at age 10 (SP + 33.3%; SP- 78.6%). In the SHP group, a significantly lower proportion of participants with additional conditions than without had age-appropriate consonant production at age 5 (SHP + 60.6%; SHP- 82.1%) and 10 (SHP + 73.8%; SHP-95.5%), sufficient velopharyngeal function at age 5 (SHP + 82.1%; SHP- 95.5%), and always intelligible speech at age 10 years (SHP + 51.7%; SHP- 83.8%). For all cleft types with and without additional conditions and for all measured speech outcomes, speech improved between 5 and 10 years of age. Speech results were poorer for children with SP + and SHP + at both 5 and 10 years of age. The results highlight the need to consider heterogeneity within cleft subgroups when planning speech improving interventions.

BMC PediatricsVol. 26(1)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Lund University (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Region Västra Götaland (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Lunds Universitet
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.