Development and validation of the Clinical Nursing Knowledge Questionnaire-15 (CNKQ-15) for assessing contraceptive knowledge among nurses

Background: Deficiencies in contraceptive knowledge among healthcare professionals persist worldwide, while existing assessment tools lack rigorous psychometric validation and standardized interpretation. Given nurses' central role in contraceptive counseling, a robust, profession-specific instrument is needed to accurately identify knowledge gaps and guide targeted training to improve clinical practice. Objective: To develop and psychometrically validate the Contraception Nursing Knowledge Questionnaire (CNKQ-15) in order to provide a standardized tool for assessing contraceptive knowledge and identifying training needs among nursing professionals. Design: A methodological study conducted in two phases: qualitative instrument development and cross-sectional psychometric evaluation. Settings: A nationwide study conducted in Spain between February and April 2025. Data collection was distributed digitally through the General Council of Nursing and provincial official nursing colleges. Participants: A total of 1123 actively practicing nursing professionals (including generalist nurses and specialized nurses). Methods: Content validity was assessed by a multidisciplinary expert panel using Aiken's V index. Psychometric evaluation included item difficulty and discrimination analysis, known-groups discriminant validity (comparing specialists in Obstetrics and Gynecology with non-specialized nurses), and test-retest reliability evaluated in a subsample of 100 participants over a 14-day interval. Standardized cut-off points were also established. Results: The final sample included 1123 nursing professionals, predominantly women (90.5%), with a mean age of 38.3 years (SD = 10.3). Most participants reported no specialization (58.2%), while 23.5% specialized in Obstetrics and Gynecology. The CNKQ-15 showed adequate item difficulty indices (0.30-0.94) and demonstrated strong discriminant validity, effectively distinguishing between professionals specialized in Obstetrics and Gynecology and those without specialization (mean scores 12.7 vs. 9.9; p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (95% CI [0.77-0.91]). According to the established cut-off points, 48.3% of participants exhibited null or insufficient knowledge of contraception, 30.1% achieved only a minimal level, and fewer than one in five demonstrated good or very good knowledge. This proportion of inadequate knowledge increased to 59.3% among nurses without specialization in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Conclusions: The CNKQ-15 shows adequate content validity, discriminant validity, and reliability. Its standardization allows the accurate identification of knowledge gaps among nursing professionals, including midwives, and offers a practical tool for evaluating contraceptive training and guiding targeted educational interventions. Social media abstract: The newly validated CNKQ-15 robustly assesses contraceptive knowledge in nurses and midwives, identifying critical gaps. @cris90due.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100536
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the Clinical Nursing Knowledge Questionnaire-15 (CNKQ-15) for assessing contraceptive knowledge among nurses

Cristian Martín‐Vázquez, María Cristina Martínez-Fernández, José David Urchaga-Litago, Laura Rosón-Matilla et al.
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Development and validation of the Clinical Nursing Knowledge Questionnaire-15 (CNKQ-15) for assessing contraceptive knowledge among nurses

Cristian Martín‐Vázquez, María Cristina Martínez-Fernández, José David Urchaga-Litago, Laura Rosón-Matilla, Marta Valencia-Prieto, María Cortés-Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Background: Deficiencies in contraceptive knowledge among healthcare professionals persist worldwide, while existing assessment tools lack rigorous psychometric validation and standardized interpretation. Given nurses' central role in contraceptive counseling, a robust, profession-specific instrument is needed to accurately identify knowledge gaps and guide targeted training to improve clinical practice. Objective: To develop and psychometrically validate the Contraception Nursing Knowledge Questionnaire (CNKQ-15) in order to provide a standardized tool for assessing contraceptive knowledge and identifying training needs among nursing professionals. Design: A methodological study conducted in two phases: qualitative instrument development and cross-sectional psychometric evaluation. Settings: A nationwide study conducted in Spain between February and April 2025. Data collection was distributed digitally through the General Council of Nursing and provincial official nursing colleges. Participants: A total of 1123 actively practicing nursing professionals (including generalist nurses and specialized nurses). Methods: Content validity was assessed by a multidisciplinary expert panel using Aiken's V index. Psychometric evaluation included item difficulty and discrimination analysis, known-groups discriminant validity (comparing specialists in Obstetrics and Gynecology with non-specialized nurses), and test-retest reliability evaluated in a subsample of 100 participants over a 14-day interval. Standardized cut-off points were also established. Results: The final sample included 1123 nursing professionals, predominantly women (90.5%), with a mean age of 38.3 years (SD = 10.3). Most participants reported no specialization (58.2%), while 23.5% specialized in Obstetrics and Gynecology. The CNKQ-15 showed adequate item difficulty indices (0.30-0.94) and demonstrated strong discriminant validity, effectively distinguishing between professionals specialized in Obstetrics and Gynecology and those without specialization (mean scores 12.7 vs. 9.9; p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (95% CI [0.77-0.91]). According to the established cut-off points, 48.3% of participants exhibited null or insufficient knowledge of contraception, 30.1% achieved only a minimal level, and fewer than one in five demonstrated good or very good knowledge. This proportion of inadequate knowledge increased to 59.3% among nurses without specialization in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Conclusions: The CNKQ-15 shows adequate content validity, discriminant validity, and reliability. Its standardization allows the accurate identification of knowledge gaps among nursing professionals, including midwives, and offers a practical tool for evaluating contraceptive training and guiding targeted educational interventions. Social media abstract: The newly validated CNKQ-15 robustly assesses contraceptive knowledge in nurses and midwives, identifying critical gaps. @cris90due.

International Journal of Nursing Studies AdvancesVol. 10
Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca (ES), Universidad Internacional De La Rioja (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (ES), Servicio Gallego de Salud (ES), Universidad de León (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.