Fluorescent Light Energy in Feline Surgical and Traumatic Wounds: A Prospective Single‐Arm Pilot Study of Healing Progression and Bacterial Findings

BACKGROUND: Traumatic and surgical wounds are common in cats, but their management is often challenging due to anatomical factors, delayed presentation, behavioural issues and frequent bacterial colonization. OBJECTIVES: This prospective, single-arm study aimed to evaluate feasibility and tolerance, and to describe changes in TIME wound scores and bacterial findings during a standardized FLE protocol in cats with surgical or traumatic skin lesions. FLE's potential had been shown in dogs but was previously unexplored in feline wound care. METHODS: A total of 17 cats with various skin lesions were included in the trial. Each cat received three weekly FLE sessions. Before each session (T0, T1 and T2), skin swabs were collected for microbiological analysis. No systemic or topical antibiotics were administered. Wound healing was assessed using the TIME (tissue, inflammation, moisture and epithelialization) scoring system at baseline (T0), Day 7 (T1) and Day 14 (T2). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in all TIME parameters (p < 0.01) were observed. The composite wound score decreased by 73% from baseline. At T2, 82% of cats had no necrotic tissue, 65% showed complete inflammation resolution, and epithelialization had improved in 41% of cases. While multidrug-resistant bacteria were found in 41% of cases, their presence did not prevent healing, and five cats achieved negative bacteriological results. No adverse effects were observed. This pilot study suggests that FLE is a feasible and well-tolerated strategy in cats with surgical or traumatic wounds, with consistent improvement in TIME scores observed over the study period. Controlled studies are needed to determine comparative efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70929
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fluorescent Light Energy in Feline Surgical and Traumatic Wounds: A Prospective Single‐Arm Pilot Study of Healing Progression and Bacterial Findings

Camilla Sangiuliano, Francesca Paola Nocera, Oscar Fantini, Laura Cortese et al.
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Fluorescent Light Energy in Feline Surgical and Traumatic Wounds: A Prospective Single‐Arm Pilot Study of Healing Progression and Bacterial Findings

Camilla Sangiuliano, Francesca Paola Nocera, Oscar Fantini, Laura Cortese, Manuela Marchitelli, Luisa De Martino, Diego Piantedosi, Giulia Abate
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic and surgical wounds are common in cats, but their management is often challenging due to anatomical factors, delayed presentation, behavioural issues and frequent bacterial colonization. OBJECTIVES: This prospective, single-arm study aimed to evaluate feasibility and tolerance, and to describe changes in TIME wound scores and bacterial findings during a standardized FLE protocol in cats with surgical or traumatic skin lesions. FLE's potential had been shown in dogs but was previously unexplored in feline wound care. METHODS: A total of 17 cats with various skin lesions were included in the trial. Each cat received three weekly FLE sessions. Before each session (T0, T1 and T2), skin swabs were collected for microbiological analysis. No systemic or topical antibiotics were administered. Wound healing was assessed using the TIME (tissue, inflammation, moisture and epithelialization) scoring system at baseline (T0), Day 7 (T1) and Day 14 (T2). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in all TIME parameters (p < 0.01) were observed. The composite wound score decreased by 73% from baseline. At T2, 82% of cats had no necrotic tissue, 65% showed complete inflammation resolution, and epithelialization had improved in 41% of cases. While multidrug-resistant bacteria were found in 41% of cases, their presence did not prevent healing, and five cats achieved negative bacteriological results. No adverse effects were observed. This pilot study suggests that FLE is a feasible and well-tolerated strategy in cats with surgical or traumatic wounds, with consistent improvement in TIME scores observed over the study period. Controlled studies are needed to determine comparative efficacy.

Veterinary Medicine and ScienceVol. 12(3)
Regione Campania (IT), Vétoquinol (Canada) (CA), Scuola Superiore Meridionale (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.