Hybrid bioprinting platforms: integrating microfluidic, AI, and additive manufacturing for functional tissue constructs

Traditional methods of bioprinting tend to compromise the areas of mechanical strength, biological feasibility, and multifaceted tissue structure. Material gradients, vascularisation, and scalability have posed challenges to the rapid development of hybrid bioprinting systems combining microfluidics, additive manufacturing, and artificial intelligence to enhance functional tissues. This review summarizes recent (2015–2025) innovations in hybrid bioprinting systems that combine multimodal printing, microfluidic precision, and AI-controlled technology to improve construct fidelity and translational prospects. In this study, the literature search was done using Google Scholar, PubMed, MDPI, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink. The keywords were hybrid bioprinting, microfluidic bioprinting, AI-assisted bioprinting, bioinks, and tissue engineering. Articles were filtered based on relevance towards platform design, bioinks, computational control, strategies towards validation, and applications related to diseases. Hybrid bioprinting platforms provide better gradient formation and perfusable channel architectures, decreased shear stress on cells, improved cell viability, and multiscale resolution. The use of AI-enabled feedback and digital twins enhances reproducibility and defect rates, and musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, neural, hepatic, and skin models have better functional performance in application. The challenges of complexity, sterility, and regulatory barriers are still present. Hybrid bioprinting represents a significant advance towards smart, modular, and can be used in clinical biofabrication. Further materials, microfluidics, automation, and standardization innovations will be essential for scalable translation into regenerative medical care and individualized therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-026-01780-0
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid bioprinting platforms: integrating microfluidic, AI, and additive manufacturing for functional tissue constructs

J. SHAREEF, Rishabha Malviya, S. B. SRIDHAR, Balamurugan Balusamy et al.
Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Hybrid bioprinting platforms: integrating microfluidic, AI, and additive manufacturing for functional tissue constructs

J. SHAREEF, Rishabha Malviya, S. B. SRIDHAR, Balamurugan Balusamy, Tarun Wadhwa, Aarthi Sivasankaran, Md. Azhar
article en

Abstract

Traditional methods of bioprinting tend to compromise the areas of mechanical strength, biological feasibility, and multifaceted tissue structure. Material gradients, vascularisation, and scalability have posed challenges to the rapid development of hybrid bioprinting systems combining microfluidics, additive manufacturing, and artificial intelligence to enhance functional tissues. This review summarizes recent (2015–2025) innovations in hybrid bioprinting systems that combine multimodal printing, microfluidic precision, and AI-controlled technology to improve construct fidelity and translational prospects. In this study, the literature search was done using Google Scholar, PubMed, MDPI, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink. The keywords were hybrid bioprinting, microfluidic bioprinting, AI-assisted bioprinting, bioinks, and tissue engineering. Articles were filtered based on relevance towards platform design, bioinks, computational control, strategies towards validation, and applications related to diseases. Hybrid bioprinting platforms provide better gradient formation and perfusable channel architectures, decreased shear stress on cells, improved cell viability, and multiscale resolution. The use of AI-enabled feedback and digital twins enhances reproducibility and defect rates, and musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, neural, hepatic, and skin models have better functional performance in application. The challenges of complexity, sterility, and regulatory barriers are still present. Hybrid bioprinting represents a significant advance towards smart, modular, and can be used in clinical biofabrication. Further materials, microfluidics, automation, and standardization innovations will be essential for scalable translation into regenerative medical care and individualized therapies.

Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials
Google (United States) (US), Galgotias University (IN), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Dubai Medical College (AE), Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University (AE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.