Immunosuppression in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients:A Randomized Controlled Trial

Low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in a higher rate of successful transplantation in older kidney transplant recipients. Low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in better kidney function or fewer infections in older kidney transplant recipients. Background – We hypothesized that older kidney transplant recipients receiving low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone (TEP) have better outcomes than patients receiving standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone (TMP).Methods – The OPTIMIZE study was a randomized clinical trial in kidney transplant recipients age ≥65 years. Patients receiving a kidney from a deceased donor older than 65 years (stratum A), or a kidney from a deceased donor younger than 65 years or a living donor (stratum B) were included. Patients were randomized to TEP or TMP groups. Tacrolimus target trough levels in the TEP group were 5–7 ng/ml until 3 months, 2–4 ng/ml from 3 to 6 months, and 1.5–4 ng/ml from 6 months onwards. Tacrolimus target trough levels in the TMP group were 8–12, 6–10, and 5–8 ng/ml. Everolimus target trough levels were 3–6 µg/L. The primary end point of successful transplantation was defined as being alive with a functioning graft with an eGFR above a predefined threshold at 2 years after transplantation. Predefined eGFR thresholds were 30 (stratum A) or 45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (stratum B).Results – A total of 379 patients were randomized, of whom 198 were in stratum A (TEP 97, TMP 101) and 181 in stratum B (TEP 90, TMP 91). The median trough levels for everolimus and tacrolimus were within the target range throughout the study. There was no statistically significant difference in successful transplantation at 2 years between the groups (TEP 94 [50%], TMP 110 [57%]; difference 7% [95% confidence interval, −17 to 3] P = 0.91). Regarding the predefined secondary outcomes, patient survival (TEP 167 [89%], TMP 171 [89%]; P = 0.95) and graft survival (TEP 155 [83%], TMP 162 [84%]; P = 0.65) did not differ significantly. Within strata A and B, there were no significant differences in the end points.Conclusions – Immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in a higher rate of successful transplantation in de novo older kidney transplant recipients compared with immunosuppression with standard-dose TMP.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: – ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03797196.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Published
2026-04-01
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immunosuppression in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients:A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dennis A. Hesselink, Jip Jonker, Marc L. Hilhorst, Stefan P. Berger et al.
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Immunosuppression in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients:A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dennis A. Hesselink, Jip Jonker, Marc L. Hilhorst, Stefan P. Berger, Priya Vart, Silke E. de Boer, Arjan D. van Zuilen, Circulatory Health, Dirk R J Kuypers, Jan-Stephan F Sanders, MS Nefrologie, Luuk Hilbrands, Frederike J Bemelman, Aiko P J de Vries, Michiel G H Betjes
article en

Abstract

Low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in a higher rate of successful transplantation in older kidney transplant recipients. Low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in better kidney function or fewer infections in older kidney transplant recipients. Background – We hypothesized that older kidney transplant recipients receiving low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone (TEP) have better outcomes than patients receiving standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone (TMP).Methods – The OPTIMIZE study was a randomized clinical trial in kidney transplant recipients age ≥65 years. Patients receiving a kidney from a deceased donor older than 65 years (stratum A), or a kidney from a deceased donor younger than 65 years or a living donor (stratum B) were included. Patients were randomized to TEP or TMP groups. Tacrolimus target trough levels in the TEP group were 5–7 ng/ml until 3 months, 2–4 ng/ml from 3 to 6 months, and 1.5–4 ng/ml from 6 months onwards. Tacrolimus target trough levels in the TMP group were 8–12, 6–10, and 5–8 ng/ml. Everolimus target trough levels were 3–6 µg/L. The primary end point of successful transplantation was defined as being alive with a functioning graft with an eGFR above a predefined threshold at 2 years after transplantation. Predefined eGFR thresholds were 30 (stratum A) or 45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (stratum B).Results – A total of 379 patients were randomized, of whom 198 were in stratum A (TEP 97, TMP 101) and 181 in stratum B (TEP 90, TMP 91). The median trough levels for everolimus and tacrolimus were within the target range throughout the study. There was no statistically significant difference in successful transplantation at 2 years between the groups (TEP 94 [50%], TMP 110 [57%]; difference 7% [95% confidence interval, −17 to 3] P = 0.91). Regarding the predefined secondary outcomes, patient survival (TEP 167 [89%], TMP 171 [89%]; P = 0.95) and graft survival (TEP 155 [83%], TMP 162 [84%]; P = 0.65) did not differ significantly. Within strata A and B, there were no significant differences in the end points.Conclusions – Immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in a higher rate of successful transplantation in de novo older kidney transplant recipients compared with immunosuppression with standard-dose TMP.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: – ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03797196.

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.