The role of the psychiatric expert in tort litigation

The paper analyses the evidentiary function of psychiatric expertise in tort proceedings, emphasizing its significance within Slovenian contractual and non-contractual liability regimes. Psychiatric experts are essential in establishing causation and assessing the extent of non-pecuniary damage, thereby shaping judicial determinations of fault and compensation. Effective adjudication requires reciprocal legal-medical literacy: judges should understand the basics of psychiatric evaluation, while experts must grasp fundamental tort and procedural principles. The study highlights the need for unified psychiatric assessment criteria consistent with established jurisprudential standards to enhance legal certainty, coherence, and fairness in the quantification of damages within tort law. Such harmonisation would strengthen the consistency and predictability of judicial practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUNG
Published
2026-04-01
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of the psychiatric expert in tort litigation

Maja Ovčak Kos, Ana Božič-Penko
RUNG
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

The role of the psychiatric expert in tort litigation

Maja Ovčak Kos, Ana Božič-Penko
article en

Abstract

The paper analyses the evidentiary function of psychiatric expertise in tort proceedings, emphasizing its significance within Slovenian contractual and non-contractual liability regimes. Psychiatric experts are essential in establishing causation and assessing the extent of non-pecuniary damage, thereby shaping judicial determinations of fault and compensation. Effective adjudication requires reciprocal legal-medical literacy: judges should understand the basics of psychiatric evaluation, while experts must grasp fundamental tort and procedural principles. The study highlights the need for unified psychiatric assessment criteria consistent with established jurisprudential standards to enhance legal certainty, coherence, and fairness in the quantification of damages within tort law. Such harmonisation would strengthen the consistency and predictability of judicial practice.

RUNG
University of Nova Gorica (SI), European Faculty of Law (SI), Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia (SI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.