Use and Perceptions of Large Language Models Among Dental Students: Implications for Dental Education

PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the prevalence and use cases of large language models (LLMs) among dental students, estimate perceived usefulness (learning enhancement; time saved), characterize concerns (accuracy, ethics/integrity, appropriateness), and derive actionable implications for curriculum and clinical training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to dental students and postgraduate trainees at a single institution across all years. The questionnaire included items on familiarity with LLMs, frequency and purpose of use, perceived helpfulness, time-saving benefits, concerns, and preferences for integration into dental education. Descriptive statistics, phase comparisons, and logistic regression models were used to analyze quantitative data, while free-text responses were examined thematically. RESULTS: Out of the 156 respondents, 80.7% reported using LLMs, most often for concept clarification (59%) and exam preparation (36%). Nearly half (49%) found LLMs helpful, and 62% reported time-saving benefits. Concerns were expressed by 23%, mainly regarding accuracy, discipline-specific limitations, and ethical implications. Phase differences were small and largely not significant, suggesting that perceived usefulness and reliability outweighed the level of training. Logistic regression showed that students rating LLMs as not helpful or neutral had 5.6 times higher odds of expressing curricular concerns. In contrast, those reporting time saved were more likely to use LLMs frequently. Thematic analysis highlighted tensions between efficiency and accuracy, with students valuing time-saving but worrying about inaccurate information. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that LLMs are already embedded in dental students' study practices, with the greatest value in non-clinical learning tasks. Structured integration with verification and the need for faculty oversight are essential to maximize benefits while addressing concerns about accuracy and professionalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dental Education
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70218
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use and Perceptions of Large Language Models Among Dental Students: Implications for Dental Education

Pranav Parasher, Dhruv Khurana, Sonam Khurana, Zina Tambil et al.
Journal of Dental Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Use and Perceptions of Large Language Models Among Dental Students: Implications for Dental Education

Pranav Parasher, Dhruv Khurana, Sonam Khurana, Zina Tambil, Amani Rashed, Anthony Firek
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the prevalence and use cases of large language models (LLMs) among dental students, estimate perceived usefulness (learning enhancement; time saved), characterize concerns (accuracy, ethics/integrity, appropriateness), and derive actionable implications for curriculum and clinical training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to dental students and postgraduate trainees at a single institution across all years. The questionnaire included items on familiarity with LLMs, frequency and purpose of use, perceived helpfulness, time-saving benefits, concerns, and preferences for integration into dental education. Descriptive statistics, phase comparisons, and logistic regression models were used to analyze quantitative data, while free-text responses were examined thematically. RESULTS: Out of the 156 respondents, 80.7% reported using LLMs, most often for concept clarification (59%) and exam preparation (36%). Nearly half (49%) found LLMs helpful, and 62% reported time-saving benefits. Concerns were expressed by 23%, mainly regarding accuracy, discipline-specific limitations, and ethical implications. Phase differences were small and largely not significant, suggesting that perceived usefulness and reliability outweighed the level of training. Logistic regression showed that students rating LLMs as not helpful or neutral had 5.6 times higher odds of expressing curricular concerns. In contrast, those reporting time saved were more likely to use LLMs frequently. Thematic analysis highlighted tensions between efficiency and accuracy, with students valuing time-saving but worrying about inaccurate information. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that LLMs are already embedded in dental students' study practices, with the greatest value in non-clinical learning tasks. Structured integration with verification and the need for faculty oversight are essential to maximize benefits while addressing concerns about accuracy and professionalism.

Journal of Dental Education
City College of New York (US), University of Connecticut (US), UCLA Health (US), Riverside University Health System - Medical Center (US), UConn Health (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.