Effects of Structural Workforce Interventions on Resident and Staff Outcomes in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Rapid Living Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES: Workforce interventions may relieve the growing demand for long-term care (LTC) homes, but their effectiveness in improving resident care remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of LTC home staffing interventions designed to facilitate organizational change at the team level and examined barriers and facilitators to implementation. DESIGN: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Reviews, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to January 26, 2025. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trials of staffing interventions in LTC homes were included. METHODS: We conducted a rapid living systematic review with random effects meta-analyses, when possible. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 1.0, and certainty was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Barriers and facilitators were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven trials contributed to intervention effects. Skill-mix adjustment may have reduced resident hospitalizations [risk ratio (RR), 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91; low certainty]. For clinical health indicators (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.72-1.13) and mortality (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.88-1.54), the effects were small and uncertain. For quality of life (QoL) measures, there was little to no effect (standardized mean difference, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.03; moderate certainty). Studies involving family and volunteer integration in the LTC workforce showed little to no difference in QoL, and the clinical impacts were unknown. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low due to high risk of bias caused by deviations from intended interventions and selective outcome reporting. Staffing shortages and low fidelity were common barriers to implementation. The most common facilitators were staff engagement in the intervention design and structured training. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Skill-mix adjustments may reduce hospitalizations in LTC, but effects on other outcomes remain uncertain. Moderate-certainty evidence did not show QoL improvements. Future trials should prioritize resident-important outcomes and report intervention implementation and contextual factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2026.106184
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Structural Workforce Interventions on Resident and Staff Outcomes in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Rapid Living Systematic Review

Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Paul C. Hébert, Julie Weir, Nadisha Ratnasekera et al.
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Effects of Structural Workforce Interventions on Resident and Staff Outcomes in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Rapid Living Systematic Review

Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Paul C. Hébert, Julie Weir, Nadisha Ratnasekera, Cathy Prince, Omar Dewidar, Kathy Tong, Nina Ashley Dela Cruz, Victoria Barbeau, Junliang Tao, Abdulah Al Ameer, Ali Abud, Colleen Webber, Hind Sabri, J. C. Watt, Yanfei Li, Wenyu Xie, Josh Legere, Natasha Poushinsky, Andrew Costa, Vivian Welch, Gail Brunet, Linda Strome
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Workforce interventions may relieve the growing demand for long-term care (LTC) homes, but their effectiveness in improving resident care remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of LTC home staffing interventions designed to facilitate organizational change at the team level and examined barriers and facilitators to implementation. DESIGN: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Reviews, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to January 26, 2025. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trials of staffing interventions in LTC homes were included. METHODS: We conducted a rapid living systematic review with random effects meta-analyses, when possible. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 1.0, and certainty was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Barriers and facilitators were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven trials contributed to intervention effects. Skill-mix adjustment may have reduced resident hospitalizations [risk ratio (RR), 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91; low certainty]. For clinical health indicators (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.72-1.13) and mortality (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.88-1.54), the effects were small and uncertain. For quality of life (QoL) measures, there was little to no effect (standardized mean difference, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.03; moderate certainty). Studies involving family and volunteer integration in the LTC workforce showed little to no difference in QoL, and the clinical impacts were unknown. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low due to high risk of bias caused by deviations from intended interventions and selective outcome reporting. Staffing shortages and low fidelity were common barriers to implementation. The most common facilitators were staff engagement in the intervention design and structured training. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Skill-mix adjustments may reduce hospitalizations in LTC, but effects on other outcomes remain uncertain. Moderate-certainty evidence did not show QoL improvements. Future trials should prioritize resident-important outcomes and report intervention implementation and contextual factors.

Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationVol. 27(6)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Lanzhou University of Technology (CN), Horizon Health Network (CA), Toronto Dementia Research Alliance (CA), Bruyère (CA), St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA), Lanzhou University (CN), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ministry of Long-Term Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.