Riding Solo: The Impact of Relationship Status on Brand Attachment

ABSTRACT This research investigates how singlehood shapes brand attachment and identifies attachment avoidance as the central pathway. Across five studies (three of which were pre‐registered) in China and the United States (N = 2,015), single individuals showed weaker brand attachment than non‐singles because singlehood elevates attachment avoidance, which in turn reduces affiliative ties with brands. The effect remains robust after accounting for competing explanations. We also document boundary conditions that attenuate this spillover: secure‐attachment priming lowers attachment avoidance, materialism redirects attachment motives toward possessions, and cultural context moderates the effect—where societal acceptance of singlehood is higher (more individualistic settings), the negative impact on brand attachment is weaker than in family‐centered cultures. Theoretically, we distinguish assimilation from compensation mechanisms of affect regulation. Departing from prior work that emphasizes compensatory attachment, our findings highlight an assimilation process through which attachment avoidance suppresses relational engagement with brands, extending attachment theory from interpersonal bonds to consumer–brand relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70148
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Riding Solo: The Impact of Relationship Status on Brand Attachment

Kunyu Wu, Rui Chen
Psychology and Marketing
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Riding Solo: The Impact of Relationship Status on Brand Attachment

Kunyu Wu, Rui Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research investigates how singlehood shapes brand attachment and identifies attachment avoidance as the central pathway. Across five studies (three of which were pre‐registered) in China and the United States (N = 2,015), single individuals showed weaker brand attachment than non‐singles because singlehood elevates attachment avoidance, which in turn reduces affiliative ties with brands. The effect remains robust after accounting for competing explanations. We also document boundary conditions that attenuate this spillover: secure‐attachment priming lowers attachment avoidance, materialism redirects attachment motives toward possessions, and cultural context moderates the effect—where societal acceptance of singlehood is higher (more individualistic settings), the negative impact on brand attachment is weaker than in family‐centered cultures. Theoretically, we distinguish assimilation from compensation mechanisms of affect regulation. Departing from prior work that emphasizes compensatory attachment, our findings highlight an assimilation process through which attachment avoidance suppresses relational engagement with brands, extending attachment theory from interpersonal bonds to consumer–brand relationships.

Psychology and Marketing
Xiamen University (CN), Xiamen University of Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.