The power, potential of real-world data in randomized controlled trials: proceedings from a multistakeholder think tank

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for evaluating medical interventions, but they often face challenges related to patient recruitment, cost, and efficiency. Real-world data (RWD) has emerged as a valuable tool to enhance trial design, improve patient identification, and support regulatory decision-making. However, integrating RWD into RCTs presents methodological, regulatory, and operational challenges. To address these issues, a think tank was convened in May 2024 at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, bringing together experts from academia, industry, healthcare systems, regulatory agencies, and patient advocacy groups. Discussions focused on three key areas: optimizing patient identification and outcome assessment, leveraging RWD for safety assessments, and using RWD in RCTs supporting regulatory approval. RWD has the potential to simplify eligibility criteria, enhance recruitment through artificial intelligence, and provide practical endpoints for evaluating treatment effects. The think tank underscored the need for collaboration across stakeholders to address challenges, such as data inconsistencies, privacy concerns, and infrastructure limitations. The event concluded with actionable recommendations, including the following: (1) standardizing RWD sources to ensure consistency and improve interoperability across healthcare systems, (2) developing regulatory frameworks that define acceptable use cases for RWD in clinical trials, (3) enhancing data quality through robust validation methodologies and real-time monitoring, (4) investing in artificial intelligence-driven patient identification tools to streamline recruitment, and (5) fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration to align expectations and share best practices. Moving forward, implementing these strategies will be critical to fully harness the potential of RWD in clinical research and improve trial efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09680-w
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The power, potential of real-world data in randomized controlled trials: proceedings from a multistakeholder think tank

Karen Chiswell, Adrian F. Hernandez, Lisa Wruck, Jennifer Jackman et al.
Trials
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

The power, potential of real-world data in randomized controlled trials: proceedings from a multistakeholder think tank

Karen Chiswell, Adrian F. Hernandez, Lisa Wruck, Jennifer Jackman, Emily Zacherle, Joanne Waldstreicher, Noelle M. Cocoros, Christoph P. Hornik, Charles Lee, Nina Nouhravesh, Tor Biering-Sorensen, Samuel Brown, Stefan K. James
article en

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for evaluating medical interventions, but they often face challenges related to patient recruitment, cost, and efficiency. Real-world data (RWD) has emerged as a valuable tool to enhance trial design, improve patient identification, and support regulatory decision-making. However, integrating RWD into RCTs presents methodological, regulatory, and operational challenges. To address these issues, a think tank was convened in May 2024 at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, bringing together experts from academia, industry, healthcare systems, regulatory agencies, and patient advocacy groups. Discussions focused on three key areas: optimizing patient identification and outcome assessment, leveraging RWD for safety assessments, and using RWD in RCTs supporting regulatory approval. RWD has the potential to simplify eligibility criteria, enhance recruitment through artificial intelligence, and provide practical endpoints for evaluating treatment effects. The think tank underscored the need for collaboration across stakeholders to address challenges, such as data inconsistencies, privacy concerns, and infrastructure limitations. The event concluded with actionable recommendations, including the following: (1) standardizing RWD sources to ensure consistency and improve interoperability across healthcare systems, (2) developing regulatory frameworks that define acceptable use cases for RWD in clinical trials, (3) enhancing data quality through robust validation methodologies and real-time monitoring, (4) investing in artificial intelligence-driven patient identification tools to streamline recruitment, and (5) fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration to align expectations and share best practices. Moving forward, implementing these strategies will be critical to fully harness the potential of RWD in clinical research and improve trial efficiency.

Trials
Intermountain Healthcare (US), Uppsala University (SE), University of Copenhagen (DK), Duke University (US), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Clinical Research Institute (US), Novo Nordisk (United States) (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Transportation Research Board (US), AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
Intellia Therapeutics, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, NoVo Foundation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.