Future-making in the front-end of projects

• Enriches project front-end scholarship with insights on future-making. • Acknowledges both demands for commitment and provisional understanding of futures. • Proposes five strategies for the project front-end that mobilize insights on future-making as inquiry. • Strategies address timing, sequencing, abandonment, flexibility, and inclusion. • Establishes research agenda to enable more inquiry-led planning in projects. Future-making scholarship frames the future as something iteratively constructed through practices of interpretation and negotiation. The project front-end literature, by contrast, is dominated by rationalist assumptions treating planning as a vehicle to enable ‘lock-in’ to preferred outcomes early in a project. To bring these literatures into dialogue, we theorize the project front-end as a space in which provisional representations of the future intersect with institutional demands for early commitments. Drawing on practice-based perspectives and pragmatist inquiry, we propose five strategies to mobilize insights on future-making as inquiry in the project front-end: (1) strategic timing, (2) staged sequencing, (3) potential abandonment, (4) design flexibility, and (5) participatory inclusion. We conclude this essay by outlining a research agenda to enable more inquiry-led planning in projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Project Management
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102854
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future-making in the front-end of projects

Jennifer Whyte, Joseph Harrison
International Journal of Project Management
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Future-making in the front-end of projects

Jennifer Whyte, Joseph Harrison
article en

Abstract

• Enriches project front-end scholarship with insights on future-making. • Acknowledges both demands for commitment and provisional understanding of futures. • Proposes five strategies for the project front-end that mobilize insights on future-making as inquiry. • Strategies address timing, sequencing, abandonment, flexibility, and inclusion. • Establishes research agenda to enable more inquiry-led planning in projects. Future-making scholarship frames the future as something iteratively constructed through practices of interpretation and negotiation. The project front-end literature, by contrast, is dominated by rationalist assumptions treating planning as a vehicle to enable ‘lock-in’ to preferred outcomes early in a project. To bring these literatures into dialogue, we theorize the project front-end as a space in which provisional representations of the future intersect with institutional demands for early commitments. Drawing on practice-based perspectives and pragmatist inquiry, we propose five strategies to mobilize insights on future-making as inquiry in the project front-end: (1) strategic timing, (2) staged sequencing, (3) potential abandonment, (4) design flexibility, and (5) participatory inclusion. We conclude this essay by outlining a research agenda to enable more inquiry-led planning in projects.

International Journal of Project Management
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Future-making in the front-end of projects — Jennifer Whyte, Joseph Harrison · International Journal of Project Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS