Regional priorities in implementing forestation and wind energy as climate solutions in facing their trade-offs

Both forestation and wind-energy upscaling are crucial climate solutions, but they may have conflicts as forestation can increase surface roughness and reduce wind speed. Here, based on coupled land-atmosphere simulations with contrasting forest areas, we report a notable trade-off between wind energy and carbon sequestration across a range of potential forestation areas. A maximum global forestation area of 1508 Mha is estimated to enable a biomass carbon sequestration of 90.7 GtC but also contribute to a 19.5% reduction in global onshore wind energy technical potential. The strength of such carbon-energy trade-offs, however, differs among different regions. Tropics could provide large forestation-induced carbon sequestration but have a small loss in wind energy potential. Large-scale forestation in Europe and US mainland may diminish not only wind energy potential but also energy generation of their current wind installations. Our results highlight the importance of maximizing the collective benefits of potentially competing climate solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71674-8
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional priorities in implementing forestation and wind energy as climate solutions in facing their trade-offs

Pengyi Zhang, Chao Yue, Zhaorong Zhu, Wei Liang et al.
Nature Communications
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
article

Regional priorities in implementing forestation and wind energy as climate solutions in facing their trade-offs

Pengyi Zhang, Chao Yue, Zhaorong Zhu, Wei Liang, Fen Gou, Han Zhang, Ziyan Li
article en

Abstract

Both forestation and wind-energy upscaling are crucial climate solutions, but they may have conflicts as forestation can increase surface roughness and reduce wind speed. Here, based on coupled land-atmosphere simulations with contrasting forest areas, we report a notable trade-off between wind energy and carbon sequestration across a range of potential forestation areas. A maximum global forestation area of 1508 Mha is estimated to enable a biomass carbon sequestration of 90.7 GtC but also contribute to a 19.5% reduction in global onshore wind energy technical potential. The strength of such carbon-energy trade-offs, however, differs among different regions. Tropics could provide large forestation-induced carbon sequestration but have a small loss in wind energy potential. Large-scale forestation in Europe and US mainland may diminish not only wind energy potential but also energy generation of their current wind installations. Our results highlight the importance of maximizing the collective benefits of potentially competing climate solutions.

Nature Communications
North West Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Shaanxi Normal University (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regional priorities in implementing forestation and wind energy as climate solutions in facing their trade-offs — Pengyi Zhang, Chao Yue, et al. · Nature Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS