Governance Systems in Self‐Help Group–Based Microfinance: A Social Systems Perspective

ABSTRACT This paper examines the governance of Self‐Help Group (SHG)–based microfinance systems through the analytical lens of Luhmann's social systems theory. It conceptualizes SHGs as communicatively constituted governance systems whose practices evolve through ongoing interaction, feedback and collective interpretation rather than through direct external control or formal institutional design alone. Drawing on constructivist grounded theory (CGT)–informed thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews and observations, the study identifies seven interrelated governance dimensions: reflective deliberation, knowledge circulation, reasoned autonomy, shared stewardship, tech‐mediated governance, emergent leadership and adaptive oversight. From a systems‐theoretical perspective, the study contributes to microfinance and governance scholarship by demonstrating how grassroots governance operates as a semi‐autopoietic, communicatively self‐regulating system that remains structurally coupled to its institutional environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70064
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance Systems in Self‐Help Group–Based Microfinance: A Social Systems Perspective

Debadutta Kumar Panda
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Governance Systems in Self‐Help Group–Based Microfinance: A Social Systems Perspective

Debadutta Kumar Panda
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the governance of Self‐Help Group (SHG)–based microfinance systems through the analytical lens of Luhmann's social systems theory. It conceptualizes SHGs as communicatively constituted governance systems whose practices evolve through ongoing interaction, feedback and collective interpretation rather than through direct external control or formal institutional design alone. Drawing on constructivist grounded theory (CGT)–informed thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews and observations, the study identifies seven interrelated governance dimensions: reflective deliberation, knowledge circulation, reasoned autonomy, shared stewardship, tech‐mediated governance, emergent leadership and adaptive oversight. From a systems‐theoretical perspective, the study contributes to microfinance and governance scholarship by demonstrating how grassroots governance operates as a semi‐autopoietic, communicatively self‐regulating system that remains structurally coupled to its institutional environment.

Systems Research and Behavioral Science
XIM University (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Governance Systems in Self‐Help Group–Based Microfinance: A Social Systems Perspective — Debadutta Kumar Panda · Systems Research and Behavioral Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS