Structure of the INFL in Kana

This paper is based on structure of the INFL in Kana, a language spoken in the Khana, Gokana and Tai Local Government Areas of Rivers State in the South-Southern Nigeria. This paper explores the structures of the INFL in Kana using the Government and binding theory. The paper makes the point that INFL is either [+ tense] or [- tense] in Kana. The [+ tense] in Kana has agreement property while the [- tense] INFL has no agreement property. This goes on to show that [+ tense] INFL has substantive subject while the [- tense] INFL has no substantive subject. PRO is therefore the subject of the infinitival clause which is [- tense]. The paper observes that INFL accommodates the tense and agreement properties of the sentence. The data for this paper are drawn from two sources: primary and secondary. In the primary source, some of the data are generated and others collected from mature native speakers of the language through personal and informal interaction. The secondary source is based on data collected from the library. This work stands as a useful material for teachers and students of English and Linguistics who wish to study syntax using the modern syntactic approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19501828
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure of the INFL in Kana

Dr. Kukang Neeka Nkeh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Structure of the INFL in Kana

Dr. Kukang Neeka Nkeh
article en

Abstract

This paper is based on structure of the INFL in Kana, a language spoken in the Khana, Gokana and Tai Local Government Areas of Rivers State in the South-Southern Nigeria. This paper explores the structures of the INFL in Kana using the Government and binding theory. The paper makes the point that INFL is either [+ tense] or [- tense] in Kana. The [+ tense] in Kana has agreement property while the [- tense] INFL has no agreement property. This goes on to show that [+ tense] INFL has substantive subject while the [- tense] INFL has no substantive subject. PRO is therefore the subject of the infinitival clause which is [- tense]. The paper observes that INFL accommodates the tense and agreement properties of the sentence. The data for this paper are drawn from two sources: primary and secondary. In the primary source, some of the data are generated and others collected from mature native speakers of the language through personal and informal interaction. The secondary source is based on data collected from the library. This work stands as a useful material for teachers and students of English and Linguistics who wish to study syntax using the modern syntactic approach.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Kwara State Polytechnic (NG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.