Primary care and community interventions for multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety: systematic review with meta-analysis

Objective: To identify and characterise primary care or community based interventions for patients with multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety, and to determine their effectiveness for improving patients' mental health, physical health, and quality of life. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Web of Science databases, from inception to 11 November 2024. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Included studies were randomised controlled trials of primary care or community based interventions targeting adults with depression or anxiety disorders and one or more long term physical conditions. Risk of bias assessment used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Interventions were categorised as organisational or patient oriented, and were subgrouped by intervention type. Intervention components were systematically categorised, and effects on mental health and quality of life outcomes were meta-analysed in groups defined by intervention type and assessment time point. Physical health outcomes were too heterogenous to meta-analyse and were synthesised without meta-analysis with Fisher's method for combining P values. Results: levels), but not on functional (eg, disability) or global physical health outcomes. Low to moderate quality evidence was found for patient oriented interventions (n=19; interventions including exercise, psychotherapy, and psychoeducation) which led to small improvements in symptoms of depression (standardised mean difference -0.46, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.21) and quality of life (0.22, 0.14 to 0.29) at the end of the intervention. These effects were diminished at the late follow-up period (≥12 months). In the subgroup analysis, no reported data for the long term effects of exercise, psychotherapy, or psychoeducation (18-24 months after randomisation) were found. Synthesis without meta-analysis showed evidence of benefit from patient oriented interventions (primarily psychotherapy) on physiological, functional, and global physical health outcomes. Conclusions: The study showed that interventions improved mental health, physical health, and quality of life outcomes in people with multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety, but the effects were small and, for patient oriented interventions in particular, diminished over time. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420251004355.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-002400
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary care and community interventions for multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety: systematic review with meta-analysis

Lucy Stirland, Clare MacRae, Lauren Ng, Susanne Sarah Maxwell et al.
1 citations
BMJ Medicine
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
19.73
article

Primary care and community interventions for multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety: systematic review with meta-analysis

Lucy Stirland, Clare MacRae, Lauren Ng, Susanne Sarah Maxwell, Atul Anand, Stewart W Mercer, Bruce Guthrie, Kieran Sweeney, Michaela Gilarova, Jennifer Baker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: To identify and characterise primary care or community based interventions for patients with multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety, and to determine their effectiveness for improving patients' mental health, physical health, and quality of life. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Web of Science databases, from inception to 11 November 2024. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Included studies were randomised controlled trials of primary care or community based interventions targeting adults with depression or anxiety disorders and one or more long term physical conditions. Risk of bias assessment used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Interventions were categorised as organisational or patient oriented, and were subgrouped by intervention type. Intervention components were systematically categorised, and effects on mental health and quality of life outcomes were meta-analysed in groups defined by intervention type and assessment time point. Physical health outcomes were too heterogenous to meta-analyse and were synthesised without meta-analysis with Fisher's method for combining P values. Results: levels), but not on functional (eg, disability) or global physical health outcomes. Low to moderate quality evidence was found for patient oriented interventions (n=19; interventions including exercise, psychotherapy, and psychoeducation) which led to small improvements in symptoms of depression (standardised mean difference -0.46, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.21) and quality of life (0.22, 0.14 to 0.29) at the end of the intervention. These effects were diminished at the late follow-up period (≥12 months). In the subgroup analysis, no reported data for the long term effects of exercise, psychotherapy, or psychoeducation (18-24 months after randomisation) were found. Synthesis without meta-analysis showed evidence of benefit from patient oriented interventions (primarily psychotherapy) on physiological, functional, and global physical health outcomes. Conclusions: The study showed that interventions improved mental health, physical health, and quality of life outcomes in people with multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety, but the effects were small and, for patient oriented interventions in particular, diminished over time. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420251004355.

BMJ MedicineVol. 5(1)
NHS Education for Scotland (GB), Global Brain Health Institute (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
19.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.