Historical crime and criminal justice classifications: Data and methodological considerations

This article reports on a large-scale historical criminology project to create longitudinal datasets of Australian prosecutorial data. We reflect on the decade-long process of digitization, transcription, classification, and aggregation that transformed hundreds of thousands of handwritten manuscript records into open-source, machine-readable data now readily available for analysis by researchers. Secondly, we explore the possibilities of developing historically relevant offense, verdict and sentence classification systems to analyze longitudinal data globally and offer comparisons to other available classification systems. We propose that this approach is a necessary next step to ensure we develop robust and replicable scholarship in historical criminology, but the development of such a framework needs to be highly attentive to issues of missing data and changing historical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2026.2649809
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historical crime and criminal justice classifications: Data and methodological considerations

Yorick Smaal, Mark Finnane, Alana Piper, Andy Kaladelfos et al.
Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
Forensic and Genetic Research
article

Historical crime and criminal justice classifications: Data and methodological considerations

Yorick Smaal, Mark Finnane, Alana Piper, Andy Kaladelfos, Robyn Blewer, Lisa Durnian
article en

Abstract

This article reports on a large-scale historical criminology project to create longitudinal datasets of Australian prosecutorial data. We reflect on the decade-long process of digitization, transcription, classification, and aggregation that transformed hundreds of thousands of handwritten manuscript records into open-source, machine-readable data now readily available for analysis by researchers. Secondly, we explore the possibilities of developing historically relevant offense, verdict and sentence classification systems to analyze longitudinal data globally and offer comparisons to other available classification systems. We propose that this approach is a necessary next step to ensure we develop robust and replicable scholarship in historical criminology, but the development of such a framework needs to be highly attentive to issues of missing data and changing historical contexts.

Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
Griffith University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Forensic and Genetic Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Historical crime and criminal justice classifications: Data and methodological considerations — Yorick Smaal, Mark Finnane, et al. · Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS