Punching Shear Capacity Model in Reinforced Concrete Flat Slab Without Shear Reinforcement, Based on Fracture Mechanics and Statistical Approach

ABSTRACT Reinforced concrete (RC) flat slabs are cost‐effective and structurally efficient, but they are vulnerable to brittle punching shear failure at the connections between slabs and columns. However, existing design formulations lack the simplicity and accuracy needed to capture this behavior under concentrated loads. Therefore, improved and accurate models predicting punching shear capacity are needed. This study presents a fracture mechanics‐based model for evaluating the punching shear capacity of concrete flat slabs without shear reinforcements. The model's prediction is evaluated against 141 experimental test results reported in the literature to verify its accuracy, reliability, and consistency. The model achieves mean, coefficient of variation (COV), mean absolute error (MAE), and R 2 values of 1.01%, 13.21%, 11.55%, and 0.93, respectively. Comparison with existing models from different researchers and design codes demonstrated that the proposed model offers superior reliability and accuracy. Its enhanced performance is attributed to the incorporation of critical parameters such as reinforcement ratio, crack‐opening behavior, and aggregate interlock, which are often neglected in some conventional formulations. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the model's robustness across various parameters, including slab dimensions, reinforcement ratio, and concrete strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Reports
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70758
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Punching Shear Capacity Model in Reinforced Concrete Flat Slab Without Shear Reinforcement, Based on Fracture Mechanics and Statistical Approach

John Mwero, Zachary Abiero Gariy, Sylvester Ochieng Abuodha, Theogene Ndabamenye
Engineering Reports
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Punching Shear Capacity Model in Reinforced Concrete Flat Slab Without Shear Reinforcement, Based on Fracture Mechanics and Statistical Approach

John Mwero, Zachary Abiero Gariy, Sylvester Ochieng Abuodha, Theogene Ndabamenye
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reinforced concrete (RC) flat slabs are cost‐effective and structurally efficient, but they are vulnerable to brittle punching shear failure at the connections between slabs and columns. However, existing design formulations lack the simplicity and accuracy needed to capture this behavior under concentrated loads. Therefore, improved and accurate models predicting punching shear capacity are needed. This study presents a fracture mechanics‐based model for evaluating the punching shear capacity of concrete flat slabs without shear reinforcements. The model's prediction is evaluated against 141 experimental test results reported in the literature to verify its accuracy, reliability, and consistency. The model achieves mean, coefficient of variation (COV), mean absolute error (MAE), and R 2 values of 1.01%, 13.21%, 11.55%, and 0.93, respectively. Comparison with existing models from different researchers and design codes demonstrated that the proposed model offers superior reliability and accuracy. Its enhanced performance is attributed to the incorporation of critical parameters such as reinforcement ratio, crack‐opening behavior, and aggregate interlock, which are often neglected in some conventional formulations. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the model's robustness across various parameters, including slab dimensions, reinforcement ratio, and concrete strength.

Engineering ReportsVol. 8(4)
University of Nairobi (KE), Technical University of Kenya (KE), Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (KE), African Centre for Technology Studies (KE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.