Network State Credit Rating Framework (NSCRF) v1.1: A First-Principles Methodology for Assessing Creditworthiness of Network States — 32-Entity Cohort Application

No credit rating methodology exists for Network States. The three major credit rating agencies — Moody's, S&P Global, and Fitch — collectively rate approximately 140 sovereign governments and tens of thousands of corporations. Their methodologies assume territorial tax bases, involuntary populations, central banks, audited financial statements, and bond markets. Network States possess none of these characteristics. Yet Network States are increasingly handling significant capital. Praxis has raised $544 million. Total DAO treasury assets globally exceed $24.5 billion. The ns.com dashboard tracks 89 Network States. This paper constructs the Network State Credit Rating Framework (NSCRF) from first principles. It surveys how sovereign and corporate credit ratings work today, identifies why those methodologies fail for Network States, and proposes a five-pillar rating methodology with explicit weightings and scoring criteria: Pillar 1 — Treasury Health (30%): size, composition, burn rate, revenue diversity and growth Pillar 2 — Governance Quality (25%): model maturity, participation, transparency Pillar 3 — Community Resilience (20%): retention, engagement, cohesion Pillar 4 — Infrastructure Robustness (15%): physical, digital, operational Pillar 5 — External Risk (10%): regulatory, host-country, concentration Rating scale: NS-AAA through NS-D. v1.1 changes: The illustrative ratings cohort expanded from 7 to 32 Network States (NSDI ≥ 0.20). Notable additions include Gelephu Mindfulness City (state-backed Bhutanese SEZ — first investment-grade candidate), Kleros (decentralised court — NS-BB), Catawba CDEZ, Itana, Ciudad Morazán (second Honduran ZEDE), Edge City, Don't Die, Urbit, Proof of Humanity, Frontier Tower, RNS.ID (Palau digital residency), Oceanix, Liberstad, Ârc, and 11 others. The remaining 57 entities (below NSDI 0.20 threshold) are documented in an appendix. Pillar 5 introduces a new Host-Country Recognition Risk indicator following the Prospera ICSID precedent (Honduras ZEDE law repealed 2022; $10.7B arbitration pending). Key v1.1 finding: Gelephu Mindfulness City may be the first Network State approaching investment-grade due to its state-backed Special Administrative Region status. Liberland's rating reduced (NS-CC → NS-C) after deeper external-risk analysis. No Network State in 2026 fully meets investment-grade criteria, with the possible exception of state-backed entities. Indicative ratings (selected): Network School NS-BB (55.6), Prospera/Infinita NS-CCC (49.7), Zuzalu NS-B (42.5), Praxis NS-CCC (39.7), CityDAO NS-CCC (39.3), plus 25 newly-rated entities. The paper also assesses the commercial viability of establishing a Network State credit rating agency. The NSCRF is the second paper in a four-paper research programme. Companion papers: Grey, K. M. (2026). Network State Classification Framework (NSCF) v2.1. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19561980 Grey, K. M. (2026). Network State Economic Index (NSEI) v1.0. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19563284 Grey, K. M. (2026). Network State ESG Framework (NS-ESG) v1.0. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19674199 Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19493109
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network State Credit Rating Framework (NSCRF) v1.1: A First-Principles Methodology for Assessing Creditworthiness of Network States — 32-Entity Cohort Application

Kathleen Maree Grey
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

Network State Credit Rating Framework (NSCRF) v1.1: A First-Principles Methodology for Assessing Creditworthiness of Network States — 32-Entity Cohort Application

Kathleen Maree Grey
article en

Abstract

No credit rating methodology exists for Network States. The three major credit rating agencies — Moody's, S&P Global, and Fitch — collectively rate approximately 140 sovereign governments and tens of thousands of corporations. Their methodologies assume territorial tax bases, involuntary populations, central banks, audited financial statements, and bond markets. Network States possess none of these characteristics. Yet Network States are increasingly handling significant capital. Praxis has raised $544 million. Total DAO treasury assets globally exceed $24.5 billion. The ns.com dashboard tracks 89 Network States. This paper constructs the Network State Credit Rating Framework (NSCRF) from first principles. It surveys how sovereign and corporate credit ratings work today, identifies why those methodologies fail for Network States, and proposes a five-pillar rating methodology with explicit weightings and scoring criteria: Pillar 1 — Treasury Health (30%): size, composition, burn rate, revenue diversity and growth Pillar 2 — Governance Quality (25%): model maturity, participation, transparency Pillar 3 — Community Resilience (20%): retention, engagement, cohesion Pillar 4 — Infrastructure Robustness (15%): physical, digital, operational Pillar 5 — External Risk (10%): regulatory, host-country, concentration Rating scale: NS-AAA through NS-D. v1.1 changes: The illustrative ratings cohort expanded from 7 to 32 Network States (NSDI ≥ 0.20). Notable additions include Gelephu Mindfulness City (state-backed Bhutanese SEZ — first investment-grade candidate), Kleros (decentralised court — NS-BB), Catawba CDEZ, Itana, Ciudad Morazán (second Honduran ZEDE), Edge City, Don't Die, Urbit, Proof of Humanity, Frontier Tower, RNS.ID (Palau digital residency), Oceanix, Liberstad, Ârc, and 11 others. The remaining 57 entities (below NSDI 0.20 threshold) are documented in an appendix. Pillar 5 introduces a new Host-Country Recognition Risk indicator following the Prospera ICSID precedent (Honduras ZEDE law repealed 2022; $10.7B arbitration pending). Key v1.1 finding: Gelephu Mindfulness City may be the first Network State approaching investment-grade due to its state-backed Special Administrative Region status. Liberland's rating reduced (NS-CC → NS-C) after deeper external-risk analysis. No Network State in 2026 fully meets investment-grade criteria, with the possible exception of state-backed entities. Indicative ratings (selected): Network School NS-BB (55.6), Prospera/Infinita NS-CCC (49.7), Zuzalu NS-B (42.5), Praxis NS-CCC (39.7), CityDAO NS-CCC (39.3), plus 25 newly-rated entities. The paper also assesses the commercial viability of establishing a Network State credit rating agency. The NSCRF is the second paper in a four-paper research programme. Companion papers: Grey, K. M. (2026). Network State Classification Framework (NSCF) v2.1. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19561980 Grey, K. M. (2026). Network State Economic Index (NSEI) v1.0. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19563284 Grey, K. M. (2026). Network State ESG Framework (NS-ESG) v1.0. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19674199 Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Forest Research Institute Malaysia (MY)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.