Female-specific risk factors for lung cancer: insights from the All of Us Research Program

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in females, with slower declines in incidence compared to males. While smoking is the leading risk factor, it doesn’t fully explain the increasing lung cancer burden in females. Reproductive factors, metabolic disorders, family history, and their interactions may also influence risk; however, these remain poorly understood, particularly across diverse groups. To explore this, we conducted a case-control study using All of Us Research Program data to examine these factors and their association with lung cancer risk in adult females. Using de-identified data from the All of Us Research Program, we conducted an age-matched case-control study to investigate the relationship between sociodemographic factors, reproductive history, metabolic disorders, and family history and lung cancer risk in adult females. Cases and controls (n = 5,500) were identified using SNOMED-CT codes with 1:1 matching. We used descriptive statistics, as well as chi-square and t-tests for group comparisons, followed by multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounders and estimate the odds of lung cancer. Lung cancer patients had a mean age of 67.9 years (SD ± 11.9) and BMI of 28.9 (SD ± 7.1). Most were non-Hispanic Whites (63.4%), followed by non-Hispanic Blacks (14.5%) and Hispanics (12.2%). Overweight females had lower odds (adjusted OR = 0.78, p = 0.0003), while smoking increased the risk (adjusted OR = 1.28, p = 0.0023). Postmenopausal bleeding (adjusted OR = 1.59, p < 0.001) and menopause (adjusted OR = 1.47, p < 0.001) increased the risk, especially in smokers (adjusted OR = 2.65, p < 0.001) and Asian menopausal females (adjusted OR = 2.67, p = 0.04). Hyperlipidemia (adjusted OR = 1.57, p < 0.001) and hypothyroidism (adjusted OR = 1.63, p < 0.001) were significant, with smoking amplifying hyperlipidemia risk (adjusted OR = 1.71, p < 0.001). Risk was also higher in smokers with lung cancer family history (adjusted OR = 1.94, p = 0.03), postmenopausal females with such a history (adjusted OR = 2.10, p = 0.03), and females with breast cancer family history combined with hypothyroidism (adjusted OR = 1.64, p = 0.0038) or postmenopausal bleeding (adjusted OR = 1.82, p = 0.017). Beyond smoking, sociodemographic, reproductive, metabolic, and family history factors, along with their interactions, also influence lung cancer risk in females. Identifying these can aid early detection and prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27269-5
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Female-specific risk factors for lung cancer: insights from the All of Us Research Program

Habibul Ahsan, Hasan Shahriar, Saira Tasmin, Humayera Islam et al.
BMC Public Health
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Female-specific risk factors for lung cancer: insights from the All of Us Research Program

Habibul Ahsan, Hasan Shahriar, Saira Tasmin, Humayera Islam, Syeda Masuma Siddiqua, MR Islam, Muhammad Ashique Haider Chowdhury, Sreenivas Konda
article en

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in females, with slower declines in incidence compared to males. While smoking is the leading risk factor, it doesn’t fully explain the increasing lung cancer burden in females. Reproductive factors, metabolic disorders, family history, and their interactions may also influence risk; however, these remain poorly understood, particularly across diverse groups. To explore this, we conducted a case-control study using All of Us Research Program data to examine these factors and their association with lung cancer risk in adult females. Using de-identified data from the All of Us Research Program, we conducted an age-matched case-control study to investigate the relationship between sociodemographic factors, reproductive history, metabolic disorders, and family history and lung cancer risk in adult females. Cases and controls (n = 5,500) were identified using SNOMED-CT codes with 1:1 matching. We used descriptive statistics, as well as chi-square and t-tests for group comparisons, followed by multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounders and estimate the odds of lung cancer. Lung cancer patients had a mean age of 67.9 years (SD ± 11.9) and BMI of 28.9 (SD ± 7.1). Most were non-Hispanic Whites (63.4%), followed by non-Hispanic Blacks (14.5%) and Hispanics (12.2%). Overweight females had lower odds (adjusted OR = 0.78, p = 0.0003), while smoking increased the risk (adjusted OR = 1.28, p = 0.0023). Postmenopausal bleeding (adjusted OR = 1.59, p < 0.001) and menopause (adjusted OR = 1.47, p < 0.001) increased the risk, especially in smokers (adjusted OR = 2.65, p < 0.001) and Asian menopausal females (adjusted OR = 2.67, p = 0.04). Hyperlipidemia (adjusted OR = 1.57, p < 0.001) and hypothyroidism (adjusted OR = 1.63, p < 0.001) were significant, with smoking amplifying hyperlipidemia risk (adjusted OR = 1.71, p < 0.001). Risk was also higher in smokers with lung cancer family history (adjusted OR = 1.94, p = 0.03), postmenopausal females with such a history (adjusted OR = 2.10, p = 0.03), and females with breast cancer family history combined with hypothyroidism (adjusted OR = 1.64, p = 0.0038) or postmenopausal bleeding (adjusted OR = 1.82, p = 0.017). Beyond smoking, sociodemographic, reproductive, metabolic, and family history factors, along with their interactions, also influence lung cancer risk in females. Identifying these can aid early detection and prevention.

BMC Public Health
Chicago Department of Public Health (US), Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis (US), University of Chicago (US), Dhaka Community Hospital Trust (BD), National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.