RW-UCFI: A Risk-Weighted Uncertainty-Conditioned Explainability Framework for Stacked Ensemble Models in B2B Financial Risk Profiling

Interpretability in corporate financial risk profiling must support not only predictive performance but also governance-oriented decision-making. This study proposes a three-class financial risk assessment workflow for B2B settings and introduces Risk-Weighted Uncertainty-Conditioned Feature Importance (RW-UCFI) as a post-explanation prioritization framework. RW-UCFI is not a new attribution method; rather, it reorganizes existing explanation outputs according to class sensitivity, predictive uncertainty, and asymmetric risk relevance. The empirical analysis uses a single cross-sectional dataset of 954 Indonesia Stock Exchange-listed firms with organizationally provided Low Risk, Medium Risk, and High Risk labels. A stacked ensemble model is used as the explanatory substrate, followed by calibration analysis, uncertainty analysis, and governance-oriented explainability aggregation. On the held-out validation set, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.7487 and a macro ROC-AUC of 0.8630. Repeated stratified validation indicated moderately stable aggregate performance, although class-level reliability remained uneven, with High Risk recall emerging as the weakest and most variable component. The original model showed the most favorable probability reliability among the evaluated variants, whereas temperature scaling and one-vs-rest isotonic regression did not improve calibration. Uncertainty analysis further showed that the most uncertain cases concentrated substantially more misclassifications and High Risk misses; the top 30% most uncertain cases captured 52.1% of all errors and 43.8% of High Risk misses. RW-UCFI produced a materially different feature-priority structure from standard global SHAP ranking, suggesting that explanation outputs may become more decision-relevant for governance-oriented review when contextualized by uncertainty and asymmetric risk conditions in the present setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17040363
Primary Topic
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RW-UCFI: A Risk-Weighted Uncertainty-Conditioned Explainability Framework for Stacked Ensemble Models in B2B Financial Risk Profiling

Budi Warsito, Rahmat Gernowo, Carolus Borromeus Widiyatmoko
Information
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
article

RW-UCFI: A Risk-Weighted Uncertainty-Conditioned Explainability Framework for Stacked Ensemble Models in B2B Financial Risk Profiling

Budi Warsito, Rahmat Gernowo, Carolus Borromeus Widiyatmoko
article en

Abstract

Interpretability in corporate financial risk profiling must support not only predictive performance but also governance-oriented decision-making. This study proposes a three-class financial risk assessment workflow for B2B settings and introduces Risk-Weighted Uncertainty-Conditioned Feature Importance (RW-UCFI) as a post-explanation prioritization framework. RW-UCFI is not a new attribution method; rather, it reorganizes existing explanation outputs according to class sensitivity, predictive uncertainty, and asymmetric risk relevance. The empirical analysis uses a single cross-sectional dataset of 954 Indonesia Stock Exchange-listed firms with organizationally provided Low Risk, Medium Risk, and High Risk labels. A stacked ensemble model is used as the explanatory substrate, followed by calibration analysis, uncertainty analysis, and governance-oriented explainability aggregation. On the held-out validation set, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.7487 and a macro ROC-AUC of 0.8630. Repeated stratified validation indicated moderately stable aggregate performance, although class-level reliability remained uneven, with High Risk recall emerging as the weakest and most variable component. The original model showed the most favorable probability reliability among the evaluated variants, whereas temperature scaling and one-vs-rest isotonic regression did not improve calibration. Uncertainty analysis further showed that the most uncertain cases concentrated substantially more misclassifications and High Risk misses; the top 30% most uncertain cases captured 52.1% of all errors and 43.8% of High Risk misses. RW-UCFI produced a materially different feature-priority structure from standard global SHAP ranking, suggesting that explanation outputs may become more decision-relevant for governance-oriented review when contextualized by uncertainty and asymmetric risk conditions in the present setting.

InformationVol. 17(4)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.