A Role for Public Health Training Through the Funding of University Departments of Rural Health

AIM: This commentary articulates the need for strengthened public health training and workforce development in rural and remote Australia, arguing that investment in preventive, community-centred public health is essential to addressing longstanding health inequities. Rural and remote communities experience disproportionately high burdens of chronic disease, injury and premature mortality that are inadequately addressed within a health system that prioritises clinical care over population-level approaches. CONTEXT: The authors situate this argument within the historical and contemporary context of rural disparities and rural health workforce policy. While University Departments of Rural Health (UDRHs) have long supported interprofessional rural training, the 2016 Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training (RHMT) programme narrowed eligible disciplines and excluded public health. APPROACH: The paper argues for strengthening rural public and preventive health within RHMT to build a locally embedded workforce capable of addressing the social, environmental and economic determinants of health. This includes supporting culturally safe, community-led public health training in First Nations communities and recognising that local leadership and knowledge systems are central to effective solutions. The authors highlight systemic underinvestment in rural public health, noting limited health workforce, inadequate preventive infrastructure and a misalignment between national strategies and on-the-ground capacity. CONCLUSION: Achieving rural health equity requires renewed policy commitment to public health within the rural health training pipeline. Enabling public health students to train in rural areas alongside clinical students offers a cost-neutral, immediately implementable step towards building a capable, community-connected, prevention-oriented rural health workforce.