Multi‐Timescale Responses of the EEJ to Energy Deposition in the Auroral Region During the 10 May 2024 Superstorm

Abstract Based on data from ground‐based magnetometers in four longitudinal sectors across the Americas and Asia, this study presents a detailed analysis of the equatorial electrojet (EEJ) driving mechanisms during the intense geomagnetic storm of May 10–11, 2024. Our results reveal a clear evolution of the driving mechanisms throughout the storm. During the main phase, EEJ variations were predominantly driven by the prompt penetration electric field (PPEF), although an early onset of the disturbance dynamo electric field (DDEF) was also identified. In the recovery phase, however, the dynamic process transitioned into a complex, multi‐timescale competition. A slowly varying, DDEF‐dominated background field contended with frequent, PPEF‐like electric field penetrations driven using internal magnetospheric processes. This complexity is highlighted by several significant EEJ disturbances that cannot be explained by typical Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) conditions, such as a pulse‐like disturbance during the main phase and fluctuations without an IMF trigger in the late recovery phase. The drivers of these disturbances are revealed to be multifaceted. While some disturbances can now be attributed to the PPEFs following magnetospheric compression by solar wind dynamic pressure pulses, others are suggested to be driven by either high‐latitude electric fields penetrating from magnetospheric sources (e.g., subauroral polarization streams) or by DDEFs with an atmospheric origin. Furthermore, this study highlights the critical role of the nightside EEJ in monitoring global electric field fluctuations, demonstrating that it provides a more complete view of the global morphology of storm‐time electric fields and their competing drivers. These findings demonstrate that equatorial electrodynamics during a major geomagnetic storm result from a non‐linear interaction between conventional driving mechanisms and transient, internally driven magnetospheric processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ja034685
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐Timescale Responses of the EEJ to Energy Deposition in the Auroral Region During the 10 May 2024 Superstorm

F. Wang, Jia Zhu, Chao Xiong, Yuyang Huang et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Multi‐Timescale Responses of the EEJ to Energy Deposition in the Auroral Region During the 10 May 2024 Superstorm

F. Wang, Jia Zhu, Chao Xiong, Yuyang Huang, Jaeheung Park, A. Yoshikawa, Shuji Abe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Based on data from ground‐based magnetometers in four longitudinal sectors across the Americas and Asia, this study presents a detailed analysis of the equatorial electrojet (EEJ) driving mechanisms during the intense geomagnetic storm of May 10–11, 2024. Our results reveal a clear evolution of the driving mechanisms throughout the storm. During the main phase, EEJ variations were predominantly driven by the prompt penetration electric field (PPEF), although an early onset of the disturbance dynamo electric field (DDEF) was also identified. In the recovery phase, however, the dynamic process transitioned into a complex, multi‐timescale competition. A slowly varying, DDEF‐dominated background field contended with frequent, PPEF‐like electric field penetrations driven using internal magnetospheric processes. This complexity is highlighted by several significant EEJ disturbances that cannot be explained by typical Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) conditions, such as a pulse‐like disturbance during the main phase and fluctuations without an IMF trigger in the late recovery phase. The drivers of these disturbances are revealed to be multifaceted. While some disturbances can now be attributed to the PPEFs following magnetospheric compression by solar wind dynamic pressure pulses, others are suggested to be driven by either high‐latitude electric fields penetrating from magnetospheric sources (e.g., subauroral polarization streams) or by DDEFs with an atmospheric origin. Furthermore, this study highlights the critical role of the nightside EEJ in monitoring global electric field fluctuations, demonstrating that it provides a more complete view of the global morphology of storm‐time electric fields and their competing drivers. These findings demonstrate that equatorial electrodynamics during a major geomagnetic storm result from a non‐linear interaction between conventional driving mechanisms and transient, internally driven magnetospheric processes.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 131(4)
Kyushu University (JP), Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KR), Wuhan University (CN), Kyushu International University (JP)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.