Comparative effectiveness of two hysteroscopic fixation techniques (suture vs. GyneFix anchor) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: a retrospective study

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is an effective treatment for adenomyosis; however, its therapeutic benefits are frequently limited by a high expulsion risk. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two hysteroscopic fixation techniques in patients at high risk for LNG-IUS expulsion. This retrospective cohort study included 42 adenomyosis patients with an increased expulsion risk, underwent hysteroscopic LNG-IUS fixation between 2023 and 2025. The primary outcome was the rate of expulsion at 3 months postoperatively. Data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, with between-group comparisons performed via the t-test, χ² test, or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. According to the surgical technique used, patients were allocated to either the suture fixation group (n = 20) or the anchor fixation group (n = 22). No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics were detected between the two groups. At three months postoperative, the expulsion rate was 10.0% (2/20) in the suture group and 9.1% (2/22) in the anchor group, showing no statistically detectable difference within the limits of the sample. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in dysmenorrhea (suture group: P = 0.0001; anchor group: P = 0.006). Operative time was significantly shorter in the anchor fixation group(P = 0.04). In this exploratory cohort of patients with adenomyosis at high risk of LNG-IUS expulsion, both hysteroscopic fixation techniques were associated with low early expulsion rates and clinically meaningful relief of dysmenorrhea. However, due to the small sample size and exploratory nature of this study, these findings should be considered preliminary. Although no statistically significant difference in expulsion rates was observed between the two methods, the anchor technique demonstrated a procedural advantage in terms of shorter operative time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04445-8
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness of two hysteroscopic fixation techniques (suture vs. GyneFix anchor) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: a retrospective study

J. Gu, Y Wang, Xiaomao Li, Jia Wang et al.
BMC Women s Health
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Comparative effectiveness of two hysteroscopic fixation techniques (suture vs. GyneFix anchor) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: a retrospective study

J. Gu, Y Wang, Xiaomao Li, Jia Wang, ZhenHui Yang
article en

Abstract

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is an effective treatment for adenomyosis; however, its therapeutic benefits are frequently limited by a high expulsion risk. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two hysteroscopic fixation techniques in patients at high risk for LNG-IUS expulsion. This retrospective cohort study included 42 adenomyosis patients with an increased expulsion risk, underwent hysteroscopic LNG-IUS fixation between 2023 and 2025. The primary outcome was the rate of expulsion at 3 months postoperatively. Data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, with between-group comparisons performed via the t-test, χ² test, or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. According to the surgical technique used, patients were allocated to either the suture fixation group (n = 20) or the anchor fixation group (n = 22). No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics were detected between the two groups. At three months postoperative, the expulsion rate was 10.0% (2/20) in the suture group and 9.1% (2/22) in the anchor group, showing no statistically detectable difference within the limits of the sample. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in dysmenorrhea (suture group: P = 0.0001; anchor group: P = 0.006). Operative time was significantly shorter in the anchor fixation group(P = 0.04). In this exploratory cohort of patients with adenomyosis at high risk of LNG-IUS expulsion, both hysteroscopic fixation techniques were associated with low early expulsion rates and clinically meaningful relief of dysmenorrhea. However, due to the small sample size and exploratory nature of this study, these findings should be considered preliminary. Although no statistically significant difference in expulsion rates was observed between the two methods, the anchor technique demonstrated a procedural advantage in terms of shorter operative time.

BMC Women s Health
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.