What Is a Flame? On the Ontology of Sensibles in Plato’s <i>Timaeus</i>

Abstract We are all familiar with flames, but what are they, really ? Plato’s account of the ontology of sensibles in the Timaeus is notoriously controversial. The “traditional” interpretation holds that sensible entities are particulars, across the dialogue. By contrast, “reconstructionists” maintain that the ‘new beginning’ (48e2) heralds an argument whereby sensibles are proposed to be repeatable characteristics. My paper offers a novel case for traditionalism. Specifically, I argue that, at 48e2ff., we find an account of sensible particulars as consisting of co-located, non-repeatable, non-persistent property-instances, each existing at exclusively one region of the Receptacle at one time. The form of traditionalism I advocate fits better with the text than the rival versions of the view and avoids the objections raised by reconstructionists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Apeiron
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2025-0099
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is a Flame? On the Ontology of Sensibles in Plato’s Timaeus

Luca Dondoni
Apeiron
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

What Is a Flame? On the Ontology of Sensibles in Plato’s Timaeus

Luca Dondoni
article en

Abstract

Abstract We are all familiar with flames, but what are they, really ? Plato’s account of the ontology of sensibles in the Timaeus is notoriously controversial. The “traditional” interpretation holds that sensible entities are particulars, across the dialogue. By contrast, “reconstructionists” maintain that the ‘new beginning’ (48e2) heralds an argument whereby sensibles are proposed to be repeatable characteristics. My paper offers a novel case for traditionalism. Specifically, I argue that, at 48e2ff., we find an account of sensible particulars as consisting of co-located, non-repeatable, non-persistent property-instances, each existing at exclusively one region of the Receptacle at one time. The form of traditionalism I advocate fits better with the text than the rival versions of the view and avoids the objections raised by reconstructionists.

ApeironVol. 59(2)
University College London (GB)
University College London, Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.