Safety and biological effectiveness of transforaminal (TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): a retrospective cohort study including patients with significant comorbidity

The aim of the study was to compare the safety, perioperative outcomes, and radiographic fusion rate of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patient population including highly comorbid patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. This retrospective cohort study included 268 patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar interbody fusion (L3–L5) between 2017 and 2021. 201 patients underwent TLIF and 67 received OLIF surgery. Demographic, operative, postoperative clinical, and radiographic data were collected. One-year CT and X-ray scans in a subset (n = 157 and n = 174) were used to evaluate bony fusion. Adverse Events (AEs) were categorized using the SAVES-V2 system. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions models were applied to identify predictors of AEs and LOS. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. OLIF demonstrated significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss, minor perioperative decline in serum Hgb and shorter hospital stay, whereas TLIF had shorter operative times. Early postoperative AEs and reoperation rates did not differ significantly. High-comorbidity patients showed similar safety profiles. The overall one-year fusion rate was high in both groups (CT: 90.9% TLIF vs. 91.5% OLIF on CT- and 92.5% in TLIF, 87% in OLIF on X-ray based measurements). OLIF achieved fusion more frequently within the cage, whereas TLIF more often demonstrated fusion around the cage. Independent predictors of AEs included age, anthropometric factors, and intraoperative blood loss. The regression model showed good discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.735). Both OLIF and TLIF are safe and effective techniques for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions also in medically complex patients. OLIF offers advantages in blood loss and LOS, while TLIF allows shorter operative times. Surgical approach should be individualized based on patient anatomy and surgeon expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Spine Journal
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-09897-y
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and biological effectiveness of transforaminal (TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): a retrospective cohort study including patients with significant comorbidity

Kristóf Koch, Áron Lazáry, Júlia Szita, Ádám Biczó et al.
European Spine Journal
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Safety and biological effectiveness of transforaminal (TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): a retrospective cohort study including patients with significant comorbidity

Kristóf Koch, Áron Lazáry, Júlia Szita, Ádám Biczó, Ildikó Nagy, Laszlo Horvath-Szekely, Dezso Jeszenszky
article en

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the safety, perioperative outcomes, and radiographic fusion rate of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patient population including highly comorbid patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. This retrospective cohort study included 268 patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar interbody fusion (L3–L5) between 2017 and 2021. 201 patients underwent TLIF and 67 received OLIF surgery. Demographic, operative, postoperative clinical, and radiographic data were collected. One-year CT and X-ray scans in a subset (n = 157 and n = 174) were used to evaluate bony fusion. Adverse Events (AEs) were categorized using the SAVES-V2 system. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions models were applied to identify predictors of AEs and LOS. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. OLIF demonstrated significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss, minor perioperative decline in serum Hgb and shorter hospital stay, whereas TLIF had shorter operative times. Early postoperative AEs and reoperation rates did not differ significantly. High-comorbidity patients showed similar safety profiles. The overall one-year fusion rate was high in both groups (CT: 90.9% TLIF vs. 91.5% OLIF on CT- and 92.5% in TLIF, 87% in OLIF on X-ray based measurements). OLIF achieved fusion more frequently within the cage, whereas TLIF more often demonstrated fusion around the cage. Independent predictors of AEs included age, anthropometric factors, and intraoperative blood loss. The regression model showed good discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.735). Both OLIF and TLIF are safe and effective techniques for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions also in medically complex patients. OLIF offers advantages in blood loss and LOS, while TLIF allows shorter operative times. Surgical approach should be individualized based on patient anatomy and surgeon expertise.

European Spine Journal
Semmelweis University (HU), National Center for Spinal Disorders (HU)
Semmelweis Egyetem
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.