Navigating trade-offs across ownership and ecological priorities in forest conservation planning

Forests play a central role in biodiversity conservation and the provision of ecosystem services. In Europe, recent policies place strong emphasis on forest restoration and the expansion of strictly protected areas. Yet decision making is complicated by conflicting and unclear objectives, fragmented governance, and the predominance of private forest ownership. A key unresolved problem is how to design spatially coherent and socially feasible strategies to expand strict forest protection under real-world ownership and policy constraints. Here, we use systematic conservation planning to design and evaluate alternative scenarios for achieving the EU 10% strict protection target in forest areas. Using North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany, as a case study, we develop two pathways-prioritizing either large wilderness areas or habitat representation-implemented through five scenarios that differ in ownership structures, conservation objectives, and existing economic incentives. Our results show that these pathways entail clear trade-offs. Although wilderness-oriented scenarios maximize spatial compactness, they tend to represent fewer areas of high ecological value. The pathway focused more on habitat representation can better capture areas of high ecological value, but achieving this requires substantial involvement of private forests. Compared to approaches focusing solely on public land, integrating private ownership through incentive-based mechanisms markedly improves ecological representativeness, but only under high participation rates. Our results highlight the trade-offs inherent in expanding strict forest protection and show that conservation outcomes critically depend on ownership structures, participation rates, and scenario-specific objectives. By integrating these factors into spatially explicit planning, the framework can guide the design of strategies that balance habitat representation, wilderness, and stakeholder interests, helping to achieve EU conservation targets more effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129517
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating trade-offs across ownership and ecological priorities in forest conservation planning

Marcus Lindner, Jeffrey O. Hanson, Trishna Dutta, Elizabeth A. Law et al.
Journal of Environmental Management
Forest Management and Policy
article

Navigating trade-offs across ownership and ecological priorities in forest conservation planning

Marcus Lindner, Jeffrey O. Hanson, Trishna Dutta, Elizabeth A. Law, Francesco Maria Sabatini, Fabio Castelli
article en

Abstract

Forests play a central role in biodiversity conservation and the provision of ecosystem services. In Europe, recent policies place strong emphasis on forest restoration and the expansion of strictly protected areas. Yet decision making is complicated by conflicting and unclear objectives, fragmented governance, and the predominance of private forest ownership. A key unresolved problem is how to design spatially coherent and socially feasible strategies to expand strict forest protection under real-world ownership and policy constraints. Here, we use systematic conservation planning to design and evaluate alternative scenarios for achieving the EU 10% strict protection target in forest areas. Using North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany, as a case study, we develop two pathways-prioritizing either large wilderness areas or habitat representation-implemented through five scenarios that differ in ownership structures, conservation objectives, and existing economic incentives. Our results show that these pathways entail clear trade-offs. Although wilderness-oriented scenarios maximize spatial compactness, they tend to represent fewer areas of high ecological value. The pathway focused more on habitat representation can better capture areas of high ecological value, but achieving this requires substantial involvement of private forests. Compared to approaches focusing solely on public land, integrating private ownership through incentive-based mechanisms markedly improves ecological representativeness, but only under high participation rates. Our results highlight the trade-offs inherent in expanding strict forest protection and show that conservation outcomes critically depend on ownership structures, participation rates, and scenario-specific objectives. By integrating these factors into spatially explicit planning, the framework can guide the design of strategies that balance habitat representation, wilderness, and stakeholder interests, helping to achieve EU conservation targets more effectively.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 405
United Nations University (DE), Carleton University (CA), University of Bologna (IT)
Biodiversa+, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.