Industry 4.0 and the Job Quality and Well‐Being of Manufacturing Workers

ABSTRACT This paper reports an international survey of how Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies are affecting job quality and employee well‐being in manufacturing. Consistent with the theory that greater capital intensity and technological/operational uncertainty predict greater worker participation in management, the results more strongly support the optimistic rather than the pessimistic view of how I4.0 technologies will affect job quality. Greater use of the most prevalent I4.0 technologies is associated with greater involvement in decision‐making, which leads to higher job satisfaction and better psychological health. Greater use of I4.0 technologies is not associated with work intensification. This suggests that I4.0 technologies can help humanize work, although our data suggest that the transformation to a smart factory may imply that employee involvement is associated with more highly qualified workers. The study does not rule out the emergence of digital Taylorism through increased managerial control and work intensification as I4.0 technologies are progressively debugged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70075
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industry 4.0 and the Job Quality and Well‐Being of Manufacturing Workers

Peter Boxall, Adebayo Adeniji, Gordon W. Cheung
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Industry 4.0 and the Job Quality and Well‐Being of Manufacturing Workers

Peter Boxall, Adebayo Adeniji, Gordon W. Cheung
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper reports an international survey of how Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies are affecting job quality and employee well‐being in manufacturing. Consistent with the theory that greater capital intensity and technological/operational uncertainty predict greater worker participation in management, the results more strongly support the optimistic rather than the pessimistic view of how I4.0 technologies will affect job quality. Greater use of the most prevalent I4.0 technologies is associated with greater involvement in decision‐making, which leads to higher job satisfaction and better psychological health. Greater use of I4.0 technologies is not associated with work intensification. This suggests that I4.0 technologies can help humanize work, although our data suggest that the transformation to a smart factory may imply that employee involvement is associated with more highly qualified workers. The study does not rule out the emergence of digital Taylorism through increased managerial control and work intensification as I4.0 technologies are progressively debugged.

Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesVol. 64(2)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Auckland (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Industry 4.0 and the Job Quality and Well‐Being of Manufacturing Workers — Peter Boxall, Adebayo Adeniji, et al. · Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS