System‑Induced Depletion Leave (SIDL): A Structural Primitive in the SignalRupture Canon

System‑Induced Depletion Leave (SIDL) introduces a missing structural category in contemporary governance: the recognition that modern institutions generate predictable depletion through slow harm, exposure saturation, infrastructural decay, administrative coercion, and contradictory behavioral constraints. Traditional leave systems misclassify this harm as personal failure, framing exhaustion as an individual shortcoming rather than a systemic outcome. SIDL reframes depletion as a governance artifact and asserts that recovery is a structural obligation, not a discretionary benefit. By integrating Slow Harm Theory, Exposure Theory, Social Infrastructure Theory, Infrastructure Determinism, and the Eroded Subject, SIDL establishes a coherent diagnostic framework for understanding how systems exceed human capacity and then blame individuals for the resulting impairment. SIDL formalizes the insight that any sufficiently complex, high‑exposure, administratively saturated system will produce depletion regardless of individual resilience, making structural leave not optional but inevitable. This primitive provides institutions with a vocabulary for harms they already observe but cannot categorize, while exposing the extraction logic embedded in legacy leave architectures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19491085
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

System‑Induced Depletion Leave (SIDL): A Structural Primitive in the SignalRupture Canon

Signal Rupture
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

System‑Induced Depletion Leave (SIDL): A Structural Primitive in the SignalRupture Canon

Signal Rupture
article en

Abstract

System‑Induced Depletion Leave (SIDL) introduces a missing structural category in contemporary governance: the recognition that modern institutions generate predictable depletion through slow harm, exposure saturation, infrastructural decay, administrative coercion, and contradictory behavioral constraints. Traditional leave systems misclassify this harm as personal failure, framing exhaustion as an individual shortcoming rather than a systemic outcome. SIDL reframes depletion as a governance artifact and asserts that recovery is a structural obligation, not a discretionary benefit. By integrating Slow Harm Theory, Exposure Theory, Social Infrastructure Theory, Infrastructure Determinism, and the Eroded Subject, SIDL establishes a coherent diagnostic framework for understanding how systems exceed human capacity and then blame individuals for the resulting impairment. SIDL formalizes the insight that any sufficiently complex, high‑exposure, administratively saturated system will produce depletion regardless of individual resilience, making structural leave not optional but inevitable. This primitive provides institutions with a vocabulary for harms they already observe but cannot categorize, while exposing the extraction logic embedded in legacy leave architectures.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.