Pupil Size Reflects Trial‐Level Variability in Imagery Vividness During Immersive Storytelling but Not (or Hardly) Individual Differences in Trait Imagery

= 115), in which participants read, listened, or freely imagined stories that evoked a sense of darkness or brightness. In addition, self-reports of vividness were collected for each story to measure variations in imagery vividness during the experiment; and through questionnaires (VVIQ, SUIS), to measure differences in task-unrelated imagery abilities at the individual level. We found that the effect of larger pupils for darkness-evoking stories than brightness-evoking stories was highly variable. Importantly, we found that this pupil-size difference (dark-bright) was consistently largest for vividly imagined stories. Finally, we did not find any convincing relationship between this pupil-size difference and individual differences in questionnaire-based imagery. We conclude that the strength of pupil-size changes in response to imagined darkness or brightness better reflects trial-by-trial fluctuations in imagery vividness within an individual than individual differences in imagery vividness as a personal trait.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychophysiology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70298
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pupil Size Reflects Trial‐Level Variability in Imagery Vividness During Immersive Storytelling but Not (or Hardly) Individual Differences in Trait Imagery

Bruno Laeng, Sebastiaan Mathôt, Claire Vanbuckhave, Jakob Scherm Eikner et al.
Psychophysiology
Media Influence and Health
article

Pupil Size Reflects Trial‐Level Variability in Imagery Vividness During Immersive Storytelling but Not (or Hardly) Individual Differences in Trait Imagery

Bruno Laeng, Sebastiaan Mathôt, Claire Vanbuckhave, Jakob Scherm Eikner, Luca Onnis
article en

Abstract

= 115), in which participants read, listened, or freely imagined stories that evoked a sense of darkness or brightness. In addition, self-reports of vividness were collected for each story to measure variations in imagery vividness during the experiment; and through questionnaires (VVIQ, SUIS), to measure differences in task-unrelated imagery abilities at the individual level. We found that the effect of larger pupils for darkness-evoking stories than brightness-evoking stories was highly variable. Importantly, we found that this pupil-size difference (dark-bright) was consistently largest for vividly imagined stories. Finally, we did not find any convincing relationship between this pupil-size difference and individual differences in questionnaire-based imagery. We conclude that the strength of pupil-size changes in response to imagined darkness or brightness better reflects trial-by-trial fluctuations in imagery vividness within an individual than individual differences in imagery vividness as a personal trait.

PsychophysiologyVol. 63(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Groningen (NL), University of Oslo (NO), Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (FR), University of Plymouth (GB)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Universitetet i Oslo
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.