Subciliary Closure in Orbital Fractures: A Comparison Between Cutaneous and Cutaneo-periosteal Sutures

Background: The orbital floor is the most fragile region of the facial skeleton and is highly prone to fractures, making precise anatomical restoration essential to prevent complications. Among surgical approaches, the subciliary and transconjunctival techniques are most commonly used. Closure is typically performed in 2 layers: periosteum and skin. Methods: A prospective, experimental, longitudinal comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in western Mexico between July and October 2024. A total of 100 patients with orbital floor fractures were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Group 1 underwent skin-only closure, whereas group 2 received combined periosteal and skin closure. Results: = 0.826). Conclusions: In conclusion, periosteal plus skin closure was associated with a higher incidence of eyelid retraction, without reducing ectropion or reintervention rates compared with skin-only closure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000007634
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subciliary Closure in Orbital Fractures: A Comparison Between Cutaneous and Cutaneo-periosteal Sutures

Alejandro González-Ojeda, Andrea Socorro Álvarez-Villaseñor, Sol Ramírez-Ochoa, Andrea M. Garcia et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Subciliary Closure in Orbital Fractures: A Comparison Between Cutaneous and Cutaneo-periosteal Sutures

Alejandro González-Ojeda, Andrea Socorro Álvarez-Villaseñor, Sol Ramírez-Ochoa, Andrea M. Garcia, Carlos Enrique Capetillo-Texson, Ana Paula Capetillo-Texson, Xóchitl Monteón-Aspeitia, Daniela Flores-Hernández, Enrique Cervantes-Pérez, Víctor Christian Ledezma-Rodríguez, Dayana Irais Piña-Diaz, Clotilde Fuentes-Orozco, Ma. Guadalupe Castillo-Cardiel, Jazmín Monserrat Guzmán-Diaz, Gabino Cervantes-Guevara
article en

Abstract

Background: The orbital floor is the most fragile region of the facial skeleton and is highly prone to fractures, making precise anatomical restoration essential to prevent complications. Among surgical approaches, the subciliary and transconjunctival techniques are most commonly used. Closure is typically performed in 2 layers: periosteum and skin. Methods: A prospective, experimental, longitudinal comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in western Mexico between July and October 2024. A total of 100 patients with orbital floor fractures were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Group 1 underwent skin-only closure, whereas group 2 received combined periosteal and skin closure. Results: = 0.826). Conclusions: In conclusion, periosteal plus skin closure was associated with a higher incidence of eyelid retraction, without reducing ectropion or reintervention rates compared with skin-only closure.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 14(4)
Mexican Social Security Institute (MX), Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Hospital Civil de Guadalajara (MX), Universidad de Colima (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.