Evaluating the clinical decision-making performance of large language models in clinically oriented thoracic anatomy scenarios: a comparative evaluation study

Large language models are increasingly used as supportive tools in medical education; however, their reliability in anatomically based clinical reasoning remains insufficiently defined. This study aimed to compare the accuracy, depth, and clinical applicability of model-generated responses to thoracic anatomy–based clinical scenarios and to assess inter-rater reliability among expert anatomists. This exploratory comparative study evaluated four widely used models—ChatGPT-4o, DeepSeek-V2, Gemini, and Grok—using 20 open-ended thoracic anatomy questions derived from seven clinical scenarios adapted from Moore’s Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Each model generated responses without modification. Two expert anatomists independently assessed all responses using a standardized 10-point scoring system based on anatomical accuracy and clinical relevance. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Differences in model performance were examined using the Kruskal–Wallis test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Inter-rater reliability was excellent across all models (ChatGPT-4o: ICC = 1.000; DeepSeek-V2: ICC = 1.000; Gemini: ICC = 0.956; Grok: ICC = 0.977). Significant differences in performance were observed among the models (p < 0.05). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that Grok achieved the highest median score (7.75), significantly outperforming ChatGPT-4o (4.0), DeepSeek-V2 (4.5), and Gemini (3.0), which showed comparable performance. Large language models demonstrate variable yet promising potential in supporting clinically oriented thoracic anatomy education. While some models provide more accurate and contextually appropriate responses, expert oversight remains essential. Understanding model-specific strengths and limitations is critical for the safe and responsible integration of AI into biomedical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09173-z
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the clinical decision-making performance of large language models in clinically oriented thoracic anatomy scenarios: a comparative evaluation study

Mehmet İlkay Koşar, Mustafa Deniz Yörük, Zeynep Nisa Karakoyun, Mehmed Emre Özdemir
BMC Medical Education
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Evaluating the clinical decision-making performance of large language models in clinically oriented thoracic anatomy scenarios: a comparative evaluation study

Mehmet İlkay Koşar, Mustafa Deniz Yörük, Zeynep Nisa Karakoyun, Mehmed Emre Özdemir
article en

Abstract

Large language models are increasingly used as supportive tools in medical education; however, their reliability in anatomically based clinical reasoning remains insufficiently defined. This study aimed to compare the accuracy, depth, and clinical applicability of model-generated responses to thoracic anatomy–based clinical scenarios and to assess inter-rater reliability among expert anatomists. This exploratory comparative study evaluated four widely used models—ChatGPT-4o, DeepSeek-V2, Gemini, and Grok—using 20 open-ended thoracic anatomy questions derived from seven clinical scenarios adapted from Moore’s Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Each model generated responses without modification. Two expert anatomists independently assessed all responses using a standardized 10-point scoring system based on anatomical accuracy and clinical relevance. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Differences in model performance were examined using the Kruskal–Wallis test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Inter-rater reliability was excellent across all models (ChatGPT-4o: ICC = 1.000; DeepSeek-V2: ICC = 1.000; Gemini: ICC = 0.956; Grok: ICC = 0.977). Significant differences in performance were observed among the models (p < 0.05). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that Grok achieved the highest median score (7.75), significantly outperforming ChatGPT-4o (4.0), DeepSeek-V2 (4.5), and Gemini (3.0), which showed comparable performance. Large language models demonstrate variable yet promising potential in supporting clinically oriented thoracic anatomy education. While some models provide more accurate and contextually appropriate responses, expert oversight remains essential. Understanding model-specific strengths and limitations is critical for the safe and responsible integration of AI into biomedical education.

BMC Medical Education
Muğla University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.