The impact of Vaginal Flora Screening in the third trimester on pregnancy outcomes in primiparas undergoing vaginal delivery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The necessity of third-trimester vaginal flora screening remains debated. This study aims to evaluate the association between third-trimester vaginal flora screening and pregnancy outcomes among primiparous women undergoing vaginal delivery, as well as neonatal health outcomes. METHODS: This study enrolled 1,380 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies who underwent GBS screening alone or combined GBS plus vaginal flora screening at 35-37 weeks of gestation. Participants were categorized into two cohorts: Group A (GBS screening only; n = 880) and Group B (GBS plus vaginal flora screening; n = 500). Group B was further stratified into Group C (vaginal flora-negative; n = 229) and Group D (vaginal flora-positive; n = 271). After excluding 40 women with positive GBS results from Group D, the remaining 231 women constituted Group E. Clinical data were collected for each group, and intergroup differences were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with Group B, Group A exhibited significantly higher rates of intrapartum fever, cesarean delivery, and premature rupture of membranes (p < 0.05). Neonatal outcomes were also less favorable in Group A, with higher NICU admission rates and a greater incidence of pathological jaundice, as well as lower Apgar scores than in Group B (all p < 0.05). Within Group B, Group D had significantly higher rates of intrapartum fever, abnormal routine blood test results, meconium-stained amniotic fluid (≥ grade Ⅲ), and postpartum hemorrhage than Group C (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences in neonatal outcomes were observed between Groups C and D (p > 0.05). After excluding GBS-positive cases, Group E likewise showed higher rates of intrapartum fever, abnormal routine blood test results, and postpartum hemorrhage compared with Group C (p < 0.05), while neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between Groups C and E (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal vaginal flora colonization is associated with an increased risk of maternal perinatal infection, without a corresponding increase in neonatal infection. These findings support the implementation of third-trimester vaginal flora screening and appropriate treatment for pregnant women planning vaginal delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09044-x
Primary Topic
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of Vaginal Flora Screening in the third trimester on pregnancy outcomes in primiparas undergoing vaginal delivery: a retrospective cohort study

Hong Ma, Zhangye Xu, Xu Wang, Tianyi Ye et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
article

The impact of Vaginal Flora Screening in the third trimester on pregnancy outcomes in primiparas undergoing vaginal delivery: a retrospective cohort study

Hong Ma, Zhangye Xu, Xu Wang, Tianyi Ye, Bin He, Wenyao Chen, Jing Xu, Ting Zou, Yuyan Zhou, Qin Fang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The necessity of third-trimester vaginal flora screening remains debated. This study aims to evaluate the association between third-trimester vaginal flora screening and pregnancy outcomes among primiparous women undergoing vaginal delivery, as well as neonatal health outcomes. METHODS: This study enrolled 1,380 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies who underwent GBS screening alone or combined GBS plus vaginal flora screening at 35-37 weeks of gestation. Participants were categorized into two cohorts: Group A (GBS screening only; n = 880) and Group B (GBS plus vaginal flora screening; n = 500). Group B was further stratified into Group C (vaginal flora-negative; n = 229) and Group D (vaginal flora-positive; n = 271). After excluding 40 women with positive GBS results from Group D, the remaining 231 women constituted Group E. Clinical data were collected for each group, and intergroup differences were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with Group B, Group A exhibited significantly higher rates of intrapartum fever, cesarean delivery, and premature rupture of membranes (p < 0.05). Neonatal outcomes were also less favorable in Group A, with higher NICU admission rates and a greater incidence of pathological jaundice, as well as lower Apgar scores than in Group B (all p < 0.05). Within Group B, Group D had significantly higher rates of intrapartum fever, abnormal routine blood test results, meconium-stained amniotic fluid (≥ grade Ⅲ), and postpartum hemorrhage than Group C (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences in neonatal outcomes were observed between Groups C and D (p > 0.05). After excluding GBS-positive cases, Group E likewise showed higher rates of intrapartum fever, abnormal routine blood test results, and postpartum hemorrhage compared with Group C (p < 0.05), while neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between Groups C and E (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal vaginal flora colonization is associated with an increased risk of maternal perinatal infection, without a corresponding increase in neonatal infection. These findings support the implementation of third-trimester vaginal flora screening and appropriate treatment for pregnant women planning vaginal delivery.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.