CONFIDENT-HFpEF: A Machine Learning-Based Risk Stratification for Mortality and Hospitalization Using Multimodal Real-World Data

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous condition with high morbidity and mortality. Accurate risk stratification is important for advancing drug development and improving clinical care. METHODS AND RESULTS: CONFIDENT is an observational, multi-cohort study across three centers in Europe and the US. Patients with HFpEF, according to the HFA-PEFF criteria with ≥ 2 years of follow-up, were included from 2013 to 2022. Data include electronic health records, lab tests, echocardiography, and electrocardiography. We developed machine learning-based prognostic models to predict all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Model performance was compared to validated risk score and validated in an external cohort.A total of 1208 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 72±12 and the mean BMI 32±9 kg/m2. The 2-year risk of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality ranged from 13 to 44% and 9 to 19%, respectively. The all-cause mortality prognostic model achieved fair discrimination with a C-index of 0.68 [95% CI 0.62-0.74], and 0.71 [95% CI 0.64-0.78] in the training cohorts, and a good discrimination of 0.72 [95% CI 0.65-0.78] in the validation cohort, but performed better than the PREDICT-HFpEF score (C-index: 0.66 [95% CI 0.54-0.72], p-value = 0.006; 0.65, [95% CI 0.55-0.72], p-value < 0.001 and 0.67 [95% CI 0.59-0.73], p-value = 0.036, respectively). Similar results were observed when compared to the Meta-Analysis Global Group In Chronic Heart Failure Risk Score (MAGGIC). The HF hospitalization model also outperformed both comparators, including MAGGIC + natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSION: CONFIDENT prognostic models for all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization using routinely collected variables can reliably predict outcomes and potentially facilitate personalized care and trial recruitment strategies in HFpEF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESC Heart Failure
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag097
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONFIDENT-HFpEF: A Machine Learning-Based Risk Stratification for Mortality and Hospitalization Using Multimodal Real-World Data

Christian Esposito, Tobias Zehnder, Suresh Balu, L. H. Lund et al.
ESC Heart Failure
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

CONFIDENT-HFpEF: A Machine Learning-Based Risk Stratification for Mortality and Hospitalization Using Multimodal Real-World Data

Christian Esposito, Tobias Zehnder, Suresh Balu, L. H. Lund, Maxime Touzot, Javed Butler, Jerremy Weerts, Félix Balazard, Mohammad Hallal, Nicolas Loiseau, Aruna D. Pradhan, Bradley J. Hintze, Marzia Rigolli, Mariann Micsinai, Benoît Sauty, Paul Kessler, M F Marat Fudim, Francisco Torres, Vanessa Van Empel, Manesh Patel
article en

Abstract

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous condition with high morbidity and mortality. Accurate risk stratification is important for advancing drug development and improving clinical care. METHODS AND RESULTS: CONFIDENT is an observational, multi-cohort study across three centers in Europe and the US. Patients with HFpEF, according to the HFA-PEFF criteria with ≥ 2 years of follow-up, were included from 2013 to 2022. Data include electronic health records, lab tests, echocardiography, and electrocardiography. We developed machine learning-based prognostic models to predict all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Model performance was compared to validated risk score and validated in an external cohort.A total of 1208 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 72±12 and the mean BMI 32±9 kg/m2. The 2-year risk of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality ranged from 13 to 44% and 9 to 19%, respectively. The all-cause mortality prognostic model achieved fair discrimination with a C-index of 0.68 [95% CI 0.62-0.74], and 0.71 [95% CI 0.64-0.78] in the training cohorts, and a good discrimination of 0.72 [95% CI 0.65-0.78] in the validation cohort, but performed better than the PREDICT-HFpEF score (C-index: 0.66 [95% CI 0.54-0.72], p-value = 0.006; 0.65, [95% CI 0.55-0.72], p-value < 0.001 and 0.67 [95% CI 0.59-0.73], p-value = 0.036, respectively). Similar results were observed when compared to the Meta-Analysis Global Group In Chronic Heart Failure Risk Score (MAGGIC). The HF hospitalization model also outperformed both comparators, including MAGGIC + natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSION: CONFIDENT prognostic models for all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization using routinely collected variables can reliably predict outcomes and potentially facilitate personalized care and trial recruitment strategies in HFpEF.

ESC Heart Failure
Duke University (US), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Clinical Research Institute (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Sweden) (SE), International Office for Water (FR), Baylor Scott & White Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.