How a mismatch between actual and desired fertility relates to well‐being across adulthood

Introduction Most people want two or more children, but many do not realize their fertility desires. At the same time, recent studies suggest that up to 15% of parents regret having children. To investigate how fertility mismatch relates to well‐being (i.e., affect balance, life satisfaction, family life satisfaction, and work satisfaction), this preregistered study used nationally representative cross‐sectional data of private households in Germany ( N = 23,843 age range 18–100 years). Method We applied multilevel modeling to investigate if individual characteristics and regional factors moderated the link between well‐being and fertility (mis)match. Results Involuntary childless people, people who were childfree by choice, parents who fell short of their fertility desires, and parents who met their fertility desires reported similar well‐being. Only exceeding one's fertility desires was robustly linked to lower well‐being, whereas falling short was only linked to lower well‐being in adults past the fertile age. We found no evidence for moderation effects of regional‐level religiosity, social norms, and childcare infrastructure. Conclusion Researchers should consider both fertility outcomes and desires when studying well‐being in the context of parenthood. Longitudinal research is needed to explore mechanisms such as goal striving, basic needs fulfillment, or social roles discrepancies that link fertility (mis)match to well‐being.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-433589
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How a mismatch between actual and desired fertility relates to well‐being across adulthood

Denis Gerstorf, Manon A. van Scheppingen, Laura Buchinger, Michael Dominik Krämer
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

How a mismatch between actual and desired fertility relates to well‐being across adulthood

Denis Gerstorf, Manon A. van Scheppingen, Laura Buchinger, Michael Dominik Krämer
article en

Abstract

Introduction Most people want two or more children, but many do not realize their fertility desires. At the same time, recent studies suggest that up to 15% of parents regret having children. To investigate how fertility mismatch relates to well‐being (i.e., affect balance, life satisfaction, family life satisfaction, and work satisfaction), this preregistered study used nationally representative cross‐sectional data of private households in Germany ( N = 23,843 age range 18–100 years). Method We applied multilevel modeling to investigate if individual characteristics and regional factors moderated the link between well‐being and fertility (mis)match. Results Involuntary childless people, people who were childfree by choice, parents who fell short of their fertility desires, and parents who met their fertility desires reported similar well‐being. Only exceeding one's fertility desires was robustly linked to lower well‐being, whereas falling short was only linked to lower well‐being in adults past the fertile age. We found no evidence for moderation effects of regional‐level religiosity, social norms, and childcare infrastructure. Conclusion Researchers should consider both fertility outcomes and desires when studying well‐being in the context of parenthood. Longitudinal research is needed to explore mechanisms such as goal striving, basic needs fulfillment, or social roles discrepancies that link fertility (mis)match to well‐being.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.