Examining Mathematics and Science Teacher Educators’ Experiences with Digital Simulations Designed to Support Pre-Service Teachers’ Facilitation of Argumentation-Focused Discussions

Abstract This study investigates the experiences of five elementary mathematics and science teacher educators as they engage pre-service teachers in facilitating argumentation-focused discussions through a series of digital simulations. The research responds to the call for more explicit documentation and sharing of the evolving practices of teacher educators (TEs), particularly those leveraging innovative digital tools in teacher education. Utilizing a framework adapted from McDonald et al.’s (2013) learning cycle, the study examines the pedagogical strategies employed by TEs during the preparation, enactment, and reflection phases of three distinct simulations. These simulations—Eliciting Learner Knowledge (ELK), Avatar-Based Simulation (ABS), and Virtual Teaching Simulator (VTS)—are designed to progressively build pre-service teachers' (PSTs') skills in facilitating argumentation-focused discussions. Data was collected through classroom observations, instructional artifacts, and end-of-semester interviews. Findings reveal a predominance of teacher-led discussions and small group activities, with a strong focus on content knowledge and discussion organization. TEs also highlighted the importance of video analysis and modeling in enhancing PSTs' learning experiences. This study contributes to the understanding of TE pedagogies in the use of digital simulations, offering insights on what the TEs deemed useful from the experiences, and from these insights, recommendations for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-026-10657-z
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Mathematics and Science Teacher Educators’ Experiences with Digital Simulations Designed to Support Pre-Service Teachers’ Facilitation of Argumentation-Focused Discussions

Dionne Cross Francis, Justin Reich, Adam Vincent Maltese, Jamie N. Mikeska et al.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Examining Mathematics and Science Teacher Educators’ Experiences with Digital Simulations Designed to Support Pre-Service Teachers’ Facilitation of Argumentation-Focused Discussions

Dionne Cross Francis, Justin Reich, Adam Vincent Maltese, Jamie N. Mikeska, Pavneet Kaur Bharaj, Calli Shekell, Meredith Park Rogers, Pamela Lottero-Perdue, Anna Gustaveson, Heather Howell, Taiwo Jumoke Ogundapo, Devon Kinsey
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the experiences of five elementary mathematics and science teacher educators as they engage pre-service teachers in facilitating argumentation-focused discussions through a series of digital simulations. The research responds to the call for more explicit documentation and sharing of the evolving practices of teacher educators (TEs), particularly those leveraging innovative digital tools in teacher education. Utilizing a framework adapted from McDonald et al.’s (2013) learning cycle, the study examines the pedagogical strategies employed by TEs during the preparation, enactment, and reflection phases of three distinct simulations. These simulations—Eliciting Learner Knowledge (ELK), Avatar-Based Simulation (ABS), and Virtual Teaching Simulator (VTS)—are designed to progressively build pre-service teachers' (PSTs') skills in facilitating argumentation-focused discussions. Data was collected through classroom observations, instructional artifacts, and end-of-semester interviews. Findings reveal a predominance of teacher-led discussions and small group activities, with a strong focus on content knowledge and discussion organization. TEs also highlighted the importance of video analysis and modeling in enhancing PSTs' learning experiences. This study contributes to the understanding of TE pedagogies in the use of digital simulations, offering insights on what the TEs deemed useful from the experiences, and from these insights, recommendations for future research.

International Journal of Science and Mathematics EducationVol. 24(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Clarion University (US), Educational Testing Service (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), WisdomTools (United States) (US), Expert System (Italy) (IT), Towson University (US), California State University, Long Beach (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Western University of Health Sciences (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.