Remembering through Forgetting: Dementia, Holocaust Memory, and the Politics of Justice in Atom Egoyan’s <i>Remember</i>

Abstract This essay examines Atom Egoyan’s film Remember (2015) as a paradigmatic text at the intersection of law, cinema, and late Holocaust memory, arguing that dementia functions as a critical lens through which the fragility of ethical responsibility and juridical judgment is exposed. Situating the film within contemporary debates on Memory Studies and Holocaust jurisprudence, the essay contends that Remember stages a profound crisis of remembrance at a historical moment marked by the disappearance of living witnesses and the growing dependence of legal systems on expert knowledge and reconstructed forms of evidence. By placing Alzheimer’s disease at the centre of a revenge narrative, Egoyan destabilises conventional distinctions between victim and perpetrator, as well as between law and vengeance. The protagonist’s cognitive decline mirrors the epistemological uncertainties confronting belated prosecutions of Nazi crimes, where memory is fragmented, testimony unreliable, and moral certainty elusive. Drawing on scholarship in Law and the Humanities, the essay argues that the film’s labyrinthine narrative structure and its controversial final reversal do not merely frustrate expectations of closure but actively implicate the spectator in a process of misrecognition analogous to juridical misjudgment. Ultimately, Remember exposes the limits of both legal and narrative frameworks when confronted with historical violence mediated by forgetting. Dementia emerges as a politically charged condition that simultaneously threatens historical erasure and enables the return of repressed guilt. The film thus reframes forgetting as one of the most troubling conditions of justice, forcing a reconsideration of how memory, responsibility, and judgment may be ethically sustained in the absence of reliable witnesses.