Women's Care in First‐Episode Psychosis: Clinicians' Perspectives on Service Provision

BACKGROUND: Early intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services are vital in reducing the long-term impact of first-episode psychosis (FEP). However, women with FEP encounter unique biological, social, and systemic challenges that may delay diagnosis, hinder access to care, and affect treatment engagement. AIMS: This study explores clinicians' perspectives on the sex-specific needs of women with FEP, focusing on hormonal influences, caregiving responsibilities, stigma, and systemic barriers to care within EIP services. METHOD: A qualitative design was employed, utilising semi-structured interviews with 20 clinicians from EIP and adult mental health services in Dublin, Ireland. Reflective Thematic Analysis was used to identify key themes, with an inductive constructivist approach underpinning the analysis. RESULTS: Four key themes: (1) Sex differences in presentation, with women showing later onset, higher emotional distress, and lower rates of substance-induced psychosis; (2) Hormonal interactions, highlighting the impact of menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause on symptomatology and treatment response; (3) Shame and adjustment, with internalised stigma, delayed help-seeking, and disruption of social roles; (4) Barriers to care, including caregiving responsibilities and inflexible service models. Clinicians emphasised the need for integrated, sex-sensitive and trauma-informed care, as well as improved collaboration between psychiatry, gynaecology and endocrinology. CONCLUSIONS: Women with FEP face multifaceted barriers to accessing and engaging with EIP services. Implementing clinician recommendations, namely flexible and integrated care, trauma-informed and sex-sensitive approaches, and robust cross-disciplinary collaboration, is vital for improving outcomes. Future research should incorporate service user perspectives to further refine inclusive and effective EIP pathways for women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70163
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women's Care in First‐Episode Psychosis: Clinicians' Perspectives on Service Provision

Gráinne McGinty, Sean Naughton, Saoirse Byrne, Anja Stano et al.
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
article

Women's Care in First‐Episode Psychosis: Clinicians' Perspectives on Service Provision

Gráinne McGinty, Sean Naughton, Saoirse Byrne, Anja Stano, Mary Clarke, Roisin Farrelly
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services are vital in reducing the long-term impact of first-episode psychosis (FEP). However, women with FEP encounter unique biological, social, and systemic challenges that may delay diagnosis, hinder access to care, and affect treatment engagement. AIMS: This study explores clinicians' perspectives on the sex-specific needs of women with FEP, focusing on hormonal influences, caregiving responsibilities, stigma, and systemic barriers to care within EIP services. METHOD: A qualitative design was employed, utilising semi-structured interviews with 20 clinicians from EIP and adult mental health services in Dublin, Ireland. Reflective Thematic Analysis was used to identify key themes, with an inductive constructivist approach underpinning the analysis. RESULTS: Four key themes: (1) Sex differences in presentation, with women showing later onset, higher emotional distress, and lower rates of substance-induced psychosis; (2) Hormonal interactions, highlighting the impact of menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause on symptomatology and treatment response; (3) Shame and adjustment, with internalised stigma, delayed help-seeking, and disruption of social roles; (4) Barriers to care, including caregiving responsibilities and inflexible service models. Clinicians emphasised the need for integrated, sex-sensitive and trauma-informed care, as well as improved collaboration between psychiatry, gynaecology and endocrinology. CONCLUSIONS: Women with FEP face multifaceted barriers to accessing and engaging with EIP services. Implementing clinician recommendations, namely flexible and integrated care, trauma-informed and sex-sensitive approaches, and robust cross-disciplinary collaboration, is vital for improving outcomes. Future research should incorporate service user perspectives to further refine inclusive and effective EIP pathways for women.

Early Intervention in PsychiatryVol. 20(4)
University College Dublin (IE), Science Foundation Ireland (IE), Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.