Responses to Humidity and Temperature Perturbations in High‐Resolution Simulations of Convection

Abstract Convection parameterization is a leading source of uncertainty in global and regional climate models, and a lack of ground truth complicates the assessment of convection scheme performance. Here we test a linear framework for quantifying convective responses, using two models run at convection‐permitting resolution, to examine model responses to temperature and humidity perturbations. For the models examined, a grid spacing finer than ∼1 km was required for consistent (hence potentially accurate) responses, implying good representation of convectively‐coupled dynamics. The results from the tests at 100 and 250 m grid spacing could reasonably be used in idealized tests of convective schemes, as their spread is mostly small compared to the spread of previously reported scheme behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ms005340
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responses to Humidity and Temperature Perturbations in High‐Resolution Simulations of Convection

Yi-Ling Hwong, C. L. Daleu, Steven C. Sherwood, Tim Raupach et al.
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

Responses to Humidity and Temperature Perturbations in High‐Resolution Simulations of Convection

Yi-Ling Hwong, C. L. Daleu, Steven C. Sherwood, Tim Raupach, Robert S. Plant
article en

Abstract

Abstract Convection parameterization is a leading source of uncertainty in global and regional climate models, and a lack of ground truth complicates the assessment of convection scheme performance. Here we test a linear framework for quantifying convective responses, using two models run at convection‐permitting resolution, to examine model responses to temperature and humidity perturbations. For the models examined, a grid spacing finer than ∼1 km was required for consistent (hence potentially accurate) responses, implying good representation of convectively‐coupled dynamics. The results from the tests at 100 and 250 m grid spacing could reasonably be used in idealized tests of convective schemes, as their spread is mostly small compared to the spread of previously reported scheme behavior.

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth SystemsVol. 18(4)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), UNSW Sydney (AU), Collaboration for Australian Weather and Climate Research (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (AU), University of Reading (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.