Agreement Between Self‐Reported COVID‐19 and Dried Blood Spot Serology: A Cross‐Sectional Study
Background and Aims: Identifying COVID-19 cases with high accuracy is essential for epidemiological research on the pandemic's health effects. We aimed to investigate the agreement between a validated self-report questionnaire for COVID-19 and dried blood spot serology for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of combined survey and SARS-CoV-2 antibody data. Between June and October 2023, 311 adults completed a validated self-report COVID-19 questionnaire and provided fingertip blood samples, which underwent Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay to quantify IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N)-proteins. We applied several statistical approaches to assess agreement: Cohen's κ of inter-rater reliability; positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values; and logistic and linear regressions of the year of most recent self-reported COVID-19 on serostatus and N-protein antibody concentrations. Results: Two-thirds (203, 65%) of participants self-reported a history of COVID-19 whereas one-third (98, 32%) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 N-protein antibodies, reflecting only "fair" agreement (κ = 0.23 [95% CI 0.15-0.31]). Self-reported COVID-19 had a PPV of 41% and an NPV of 87% for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. PPV was low for those whose most recent self-reported cases were in 2020-21 (36%) and 2022 (33%), but higher for 2023 (75%). Compared to participants with no self-reported history of COVID-19, those reporting SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2023 had 23 times greater odds of being seropositive (95% CI: 9.18-62.5) and had 1078% (617-1836%) higher N-protein concentrations, after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion: While overall agreement self-reported COVID-19 and serostatus is only fair, there was a strong relationship exhibited between the two for recent self-reported cases, when serology is most accurate. This suggests that self-reported COVID-19 is reasonably accurate for identifying people who have previously had COVID-19 as well as determining roughly when infections occurred.
Authors
- Nicola Sheppard
- Karen E Walker-Bone (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-1459)
- Paul V. Licciardi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6086-6285)
- Catherine L. Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9327-0154)
- Matthew Carroll (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-8364)
- Michael John Abramson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9954-0538)
- Jillian Ikin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-0129)
- Tyler Lane (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6089-1827)
- Brigitte M. Borg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6412-3670)
- Zheng Quan Toh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-5837)
Institutions
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Monash Health (AU)
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
- Alfred Health (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Health Science Reports
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72267
- Primary Topic
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Monash University
- Department of Health, State Government of Victoria