Prognostic Value of MammaPrint in Diverse Populations: Evaluating Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Outcomes

PURPOSE: MammaPrint (MP), a 70-gene expression profile assay, informs treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer by classifying patients into high or low risk of recurrence categories. However, racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes necessitate an evaluation of MP's prognostic utility across diverse populations. This study explores differences in MP scores and associated outcomes among women of various racial backgrounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: low risk). Clinical outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: < .001) compared with low-risk scores. Other factors associated with worse RFS and OS were tumor size, nodal involvement, and age. Interaction models indicated no difference is OS or RFS in AA women and White women with either low-risk or high-risk MP, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite AA women exhibiting a higher proportion of high-risk MP scores, survival outcomes were comparable with those of White women. These findings underscore MP's consistent prognostic performance across racial groups but further highlight the need to address additional clinical and social determinants influencing breast cancer outcomes beyond genomic risk alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Precision Oncology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/po-25-00926
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Value of MammaPrint in Diverse Populations: Evaluating Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Outcomes

Breanna McBean, Siran M. Koroukian, Reine Abou Zeidane, Alberto J. Montero et al.
JCO Precision Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Prognostic Value of MammaPrint in Diverse Populations: Evaluating Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Outcomes

Breanna McBean, Siran M. Koroukian, Reine Abou Zeidane, Alberto J. Montero, Philip Bomeisl, Amanda L. Amin, Kassidy M. Jungles, Trisha Lal, Corey Wayne Speers, Benjamin J. Hauk, Priyanka S. Rana, Johnie Rose, Courtney Pisano, Janice A. Lyons, Citlally Lopez-Flores, Samuel Lichtman-Mikol, Nihit Mehta
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: MammaPrint (MP), a 70-gene expression profile assay, informs treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer by classifying patients into high or low risk of recurrence categories. However, racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes necessitate an evaluation of MP's prognostic utility across diverse populations. This study explores differences in MP scores and associated outcomes among women of various racial backgrounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: low risk). Clinical outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: < .001) compared with low-risk scores. Other factors associated with worse RFS and OS were tumor size, nodal involvement, and age. Interaction models indicated no difference is OS or RFS in AA women and White women with either low-risk or high-risk MP, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite AA women exhibiting a higher proportion of high-risk MP scores, survival outcomes were comparable with those of White women. These findings underscore MP's consistent prognostic performance across racial groups but further highlight the need to address additional clinical and social determinants influencing breast cancer outcomes beyond genomic risk alone.

JCO Precision OncologyVol. 10(4)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of Michigan (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (US), University School (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.