The Community‑Fragmentation Discrimination Primitive

The Community‑Fragmentation Discrimination Primitive This paper formalizes discrimination as a structural output of social fragmentation rather than a moral or cultural phenomenon. It introduces community density as a measurable infrastructural variable that determines how descriptors, identities, and categories function within a society. In high‑density relational environments, descriptors remain contextual and relationally moderated; in fragmented Western environments, the same descriptors become stigmatizing because they operate without relational grounding and are interpreted through institutionalized categories of identity, risk, and power. The paper presents a full governance‑layer architecture of discrimination: a deep historical lineage of category formation, seven institutional pillars that stabilize stigma, a power‑integrated model explaining how fragmentation amplifies harm, and an operational translation layer that replaces identity categories with structural variables. It clarifies why discrimination intensifies when institutions mediate meaning, why category‑based governance reproduces harm, and why structural diagnostics are required to rebuild relational coherence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19477923
Primary Topic
Social Power and Status Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Community‑Fragmentation Discrimination Primitive

Signal Rupture
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Social Power and Status Dynamics
article

The Community‑Fragmentation Discrimination Primitive

Signal Rupture
article en

Abstract

The Community‑Fragmentation Discrimination Primitive This paper formalizes discrimination as a structural output of social fragmentation rather than a moral or cultural phenomenon. It introduces community density as a measurable infrastructural variable that determines how descriptors, identities, and categories function within a society. In high‑density relational environments, descriptors remain contextual and relationally moderated; in fragmented Western environments, the same descriptors become stigmatizing because they operate without relational grounding and are interpreted through institutionalized categories of identity, risk, and power. The paper presents a full governance‑layer architecture of discrimination: a deep historical lineage of category formation, seven institutional pillars that stabilize stigma, a power‑integrated model explaining how fragmentation amplifies harm, and an operational translation layer that replaces identity categories with structural variables. It clarifies why discrimination intensifies when institutions mediate meaning, why category‑based governance reproduces harm, and why structural diagnostics are required to rebuild relational coherence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Social Power and Status Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.