Evaluation of sea ice variability in three ocean reanalyses and two regional models in the Barents and Kara Seas in 1991–2020

Abstract. Satellite measurements indicate that the Barents and Kara Seas have experienced some of the most significant declines in sea ice concentration and an increase in sea surface temperature in the Arctic. Understanding the processes driving these changes is of utmost importance to assess the implications of climate change in the Arctic and globally. Given the observational limitations in these high-latitude areas, coupled models and reanalysis products play a key role. However, it is essential to better understand the strengths and limitations of such data products. Models are often evaluated on a pan-Arctic scale, but results might differ when considering sub-regions. This study examines two regional coupled ocean-atmosphere models (HIRHAM-NAOSIM 2.2 and RASM), two coupled model intercomparison project, phase 6 (CMIP6) models (CNRM-ESM2_1, NorESM2-MM), two regional ocean reanalyses (RARE 1.15.2 and TOPAZ 4B), one global reanalysis (ORAS5) and OSI-SAF satellite observations over the period 1991–2020. We focus on spring (March–April–May) and autumn (August–September–October) sea ice area and sea ice concentration, the edge of the sea ice, and the temperature of the mixed layer. The results show a statistically significant decrease in sea ice area and sea ice concentration in the satellite measurements and in all reanalyses. However, only one of the coupled models, HIRHAM–NAOSIM, exhibits a statistically significant sea ice decline in the Barents Sea, albeit weaker than in the reanalyses, and no coupled model shows a significant trend in the Kara Sea. Additionally, the reanalyses show a more pronounced warming of the mixed layer than the coupled models, particularly in autumn and in the Kara Sea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean science
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-3537-2026
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of sea ice variability in three ocean reanalyses and two regional models in the Barents and Kara Seas in 1991–2020

Cecilia Äijälä, Petteri Juha Uotila, Siv Kari Lauvset, Wolfgang Dorn et al.
Ocean science
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Evaluation of sea ice variability in three ocean reanalyses and two regional models in the Barents and Kara Seas in 1991–2020

Cecilia Äijälä, Petteri Juha Uotila, Siv Kari Lauvset, Wolfgang Dorn, Lucía Gutiérrez‐Loza, Wieslaw Maslowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Satellite measurements indicate that the Barents and Kara Seas have experienced some of the most significant declines in sea ice concentration and an increase in sea surface temperature in the Arctic. Understanding the processes driving these changes is of utmost importance to assess the implications of climate change in the Arctic and globally. Given the observational limitations in these high-latitude areas, coupled models and reanalysis products play a key role. However, it is essential to better understand the strengths and limitations of such data products. Models are often evaluated on a pan-Arctic scale, but results might differ when considering sub-regions. This study examines two regional coupled ocean-atmosphere models (HIRHAM-NAOSIM 2.2 and RASM), two coupled model intercomparison project, phase 6 (CMIP6) models (CNRM-ESM2_1, NorESM2-MM), two regional ocean reanalyses (RARE 1.15.2 and TOPAZ 4B), one global reanalysis (ORAS5) and OSI-SAF satellite observations over the period 1991–2020. We focus on spring (March–April–May) and autumn (August–September–October) sea ice area and sea ice concentration, the edge of the sea ice, and the temperature of the mixed layer. The results show a statistically significant decrease in sea ice area and sea ice concentration in the satellite measurements and in all reanalyses. However, only one of the coupled models, HIRHAM–NAOSIM, exhibits a statistically significant sea ice decline in the Barents Sea, albeit weaker than in the reanalyses, and no coupled model shows a significant trend in the Kara Sea. Additionally, the reanalyses show a more pronounced warming of the mixed layer than the coupled models, particularly in autumn and in the Kara Sea.

Ocean scienceVol. 22(6)
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), University of Helsinki (FI), Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), Naval Postgraduate School (US), NORCE Research AS (NO)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Academy of Finland, H2020 Excellent Science
Climate action, Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon